Skip to main content
. 2009 May 11;37(Web Server issue):W253–W259. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp337

Table 1.

Performance of PREP-Mt and CURE on unseen data

Species Software TP TN FP FN Sens Spec PPV MCC
Nicotiana CURE 430 6189 35 84 0.837 0.994 0.925 0.870
PREP-Mt 428 6173 51 86 0.833 0.992 0.894 0.852
Liriodendron CURE 583 6006 37 233 0.714 0.994 0.940 0.800
PREP-Mt 676 5986 57 140 0.828 0.991 0.922 0.858
Amborella CURE 500 5762 47 335 0.599 0.992 0.914 0.712
PREP-Mt 655 5729 80 180 0.784 0.986 0.891 0.814
Ginkgo CURE 162 1996 14 379 0.299 0.993 0.920 0.472
PREP-Mt 462 1976 34 79 0.854 0.983 0.931 0.865
Overall CURE 1675 19 953 133 1031 0.619 0.993 0.926 0.733
PREP-Mt 2221 19 864 222 485 0.821 0.989 0.909 0.847