Table 11.1.

Model recovery performance of five model comparison methods

		Data generated from
Model comparison method	Model fitted	LEM	BIND
ML	LEM	47	4
	BIND	53	96
AIC	LEM	81	16
	BIND	19	84
AICc	LEM	93	32
	BIND	7	68
BIC	LEM	91	28
	BIND	9	72
CV	LEM	77	26
	BIND	23	74
APE	LEM	75	45
	BIND	25	55

Note: The two models, LEM and BIND, are defined in Eq. (7). APE was estimated after randomly ordering the 27 data points of each data set.