Table 1.
Normal |
Diabetic |
ANOVA1 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-C | N-CASM | DM-C | DM-CASM | D | A | D × A | |
Initial body weight (g) | 19.52 ± 7.13 | 19.08 ± 6.91 | 19.77 ± 9.27 | 20.23 ± 8.61 | NS | NS | NS |
Weight gain (g/12 weeks) | 5.82 ± 0.78c | 5.04 ± 0.36c | 16.69 ± 4.27a | 12.49 ± 3.45b | 0.0001 | 0.0185 | NS |
Food intake (g/12 weeks) | 198.24 ± 0.06 | 223.44 ± 0.27 | 199.08 ± 0.17 | 194.04 ± 0.07 | NS | NS | NS |
FER2 | 0.029 ± 0.007c | 0.023 ± 0.0024d | 0.086 ± 0.0065a | 0.065 ± 0.0019b | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0062 |
Liver weight (g) | 0.85 ± 0.08b | 0.88 ± 0.14b | 1.54 ± 0.47 a | 0.97 ± 0.11b | 0.0001 | 0.0163 | NS |
Blood glucose (mg/dl) | 95.98 ± 7.36c | 93.49 ± 9.92c | 215.56 ± 16.72a | 176.92 ± 26.39b | 0.0001 | 0.0007 | 1 |
The values represent the mean ± SD of 10 mice per group. Different superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences (p<0.05) among groups by Tukey’s test.
1The degree of significance resulting from the two-way ANOVA is shown with effects of diet (D), administration A. senticosus (A), and the interaction of diet and administration of A. senticosus (D × A) being expressed as the numerical value or as not significant (NS) when p<0.05.
2Food efficiency ratio (FER) was calculated as weight gain weight gain (g/12 weeks)/food intake (g/12 weeks).