Skip to main content
. 2009 May 27;18(6):783–791. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9489-8

Table 5.

Comparing predicted PROMIS preference scores to Fryback et al. [2]

Age groups Males Females Total
Fryback PROMIS Fryback PROMIS Fryback PROMIS
<35 NA 0.89 NA 0.86 NA 0.87
35–44 0.89 0.87 0.89 0.84 0.89 0.85
45–54 0.88 0.86 0.87 0.79 0.87 0.82
55–64 0.86 0.85 0.84 0.82 0.85 0.83
65–74 0.87 0.88 0.84 0.85 0.86 0.86

NA not available