Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Feb;77(1):64–73. doi: 10.1037/a0014472

Table 2.

Effects of FBO, MIO, and MIF vs. AO on drinking behavior.


Baseline vs. 3 months Baseline vs. 6 months

Dependent Variable Intervention comparison a Estimate S.E. p Effect size Estimate S.E. p Effect size
Composite FBO vs. AO 0.049 0.134 0.71 0.043 −0.086 0.156 0.58 −0.093
MIO vs. AO 0.131 0.133 0.33 0.186 0.044 0.153 0.77 0.075
MIF vs. AO −0.219 0.128 0.089 −0.307 −0.488 0.149 0.001 −0.535

Drinks per week FBO vs. AO 1.49 1.71 0.39 0.134 0.53 2.09 0.80 0.076
MIO vs. AO 2.60 1.70 0.13 0.308 0.32 2.05 0.88 0.096
MIF vs. AO −3.28 1.64 0.046 −0.351 −5.26 2.00 0.009 −0.412

Peak BAC FBO vs. AO 0.009 0.016 0.58 0.082 0.003 0.018 0.88 −0.021
MIO vs. AO 0.011 0.015 0.47 0.132 0.010 0.017 0.57 0.101
MIF vs. AO −0.019 0.015 0.21 −0.211 −0.039 0.017 0.021 −0.374

Alcohol-related problems FBO vs. AO −0.17 0.93 0.85 −0.111 −1.78 1.03 0.086 −0.341
MIO vs. AO −0.16 0.92 0.86 −0.052 −0.32 1.01 0.76 −0.052
MIF vs. AO −0.45 0.89 0.62 −0.135 −2.32 0.99 0.020 −0.428
a

FBO = Feedback only; MIO = Motivational interviewing only; MIF = Motivational interviewing with feedback; AO = Assessment only