Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun;64(6):553–560. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322009000600010

Table 1 -.

Comparison of conservative and invasive therapy in the global population

Variables Cons. Group (N=500) Inv. Group (N=1088) P-value Odds-ratio (95% CI)
Hx MI (%) 33.4 26.7 0.006 0.72 (0.58 to 0.91)
Hx PCI (%) 11.6 11.6 0.991 1.0 (0.72 to 1.39)
Hx CABG (%) 17.6 11.8 0.002 0.62 (0.46 to 0.84)
Hx HF (%) 12.0 5.2 <0.001 0.41 (0.28 to 0.60)
Hx DM (%) 26.4 27.7 0.599 1.07 (0.84 to 1.36)
Hx stroke (%) 3.4 3.7 0.783 1.08 (0.61 to 1.93)
Hx hypertension (%) 67.8 65.4 0.356 0.90 (0.72 to 1.13)
Family Hx of CAD (%) 21.2 29.0 0.001 1.52 (1.18 to 1.96)
Hx hypercholesterolemia (%) 39.2 49.3 <0.001 1.51 (1.21 to 1.87)
Hx smoking (%) 23.6 31.0 0.003 1.45 (1.14 to 1.85)
ST-elevation MI (%) 39.8 62.7 <0.001 2.54 (2.04 to 3.17)
Anterior MI (%) 37.0 44.9 0.003 1.39 (1.12 to 1.73)
Fibrinolytic (%) 20.0 21.5 0.494 1.09 (0.84 to 1.42)
Men (%) 66.4 74.1 0.002 1.45 (1.15 to 1.82)

Cons.=conservative; Inv.=invasive; CI=confidence interval; Hx=history of; MI=myocardial infarction; PCI=percutaneous coronary intervention; CABG=coronary artery bypass graft; HF=heart failure; DM=diabetes mellitus; CAD=coronary artery disease.