Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan 24;7(2):107–110. doi: 10.1186/cc1873

Table 1.

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) schemes and outcomes of prospective randomized trials

Reference Number of patients Pulmonary infection incidence (%), control versus SDD P value Mortality (%), control versus SDD P value
Aerdts et al. [14] 88 69.2 vs 5.9 0.0001 15.4 vs 11.8 Not significant
Blair et al. [15] 256 34.4 vs 9.7 0.002 21.4 vs 10.5 Not significant
de Jonge et al. [11] 934 -a -a 22.9 vs 14.8 0.002
Cockerill et al. [16] 150 18.6 vs 5.3 0.03 21.3 vs 14.7 Not significant
Jacobs et al. [17] 79 9.3 vs 0 < 0.05 53.5 vs 38.8 Not significant
Kerver et al. [18] 96 85.1 vs 12.2 < 0.01 32.0 vs 28.5 Not significant
Krueger et al. [19] 546 11.1 vs 2.3 0.007 28.6 vs 19.6 Not significantb
Palomar et al. [20] 83 50.0 vs 17.1 0.005 31.0 vs 24.4 Not significant
Rocha et al. [21] 101 46.3 vs 14.9 < 0.001 44.4 vs 21.3 < 0.05c
Sanchez-Garcia et al. [22] 271 29.3 vs11.5 0.05 47.1 vs 38.9 Not significant
Ulrich et al. [23] 100 55.8 vs 14.6 < 0.001 53.8 vs 31.3 < 0.02c
Verwaest et al. [24] 440 11.4 vs 6.6 < 0.05 16.8 vs 15.5 Not significant
Verwaest et al. [24] 440 11.4 vs 7.0 < 0.05 17.6 vs 15.5 Not significant
Winter et al. [25] 183 34.8 vs 3.3 < 0.01 43.5 vs 36.3 Not significant

a Not evaluated. b Overall intensive care unit mortality was not statistically different, but the mortality was significantly reduced for patients with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores of 20–29 on admission. c Not significant on intention-to-treat analysis.