Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;33(5):453–462. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20398

Table 1.

Proportional bias (%) of the uncorrected (naïve) and ascertainment-corrected MLEs of the allele frequency difference δ and odds ratio OR. Results are presented only for δ > 0.

p N power δ
δ^unδδ
δ^asδδ
OR
ORunOROR
ORasOROR
.01 .0376 101.9 -4.3 1.436 53.3 -1.8
.10 .0541 47.9 -12.4 1.640 27.9 -5.7
500 .30 .0665 26.2 -16.1 1.798 17.6 -7.2
.50 .0752 16.2 -14.2 1.913 11.9 -6.5
.80 .0898 6.0 -8.2 2.108 5.55 -1.7
.1
.01 .0258 103.1 -7.0 1.295 31.2 -1.9
.10 .0370 48.1 -15.7 1.429 19.2 -4.2
1000 .30 .0453 26.5 -18.3 1.530 12.3 -7.1
.50 .0512 16.0 -16.2 1.603 8.36 -6.3
.80 .0609 6.1 -9.3 1.726 3.77 -4.1

.01 .0576 103.0 -9.0 1.260 27.2 -2.1
.10 .0806 48.3 -16.8 1.384 17.3 -5.3
500 .30 .0972 26.3 -18.3 1.483 11.2 -6.3
.50 .1086 16.2 -14.3 1.555 7.72 -5.8
.80 .1270 6.1 -9.2 1.681 3.51 -3.6
.5
.01 .0405 104.0 -13.1 1.176 18.5 -2.0
.10 .0571 48.3 -18.6 1.258 11.8 -4.2
1000 .30 .0690 26.4 -18.3 1.320 7.7 -4.9
.50 .0772 16.2 -15.0 1.365 5.4 -4.5
.80 .0903 6.1 -10.4 1.441 2.4 -3.1

un: uncorrected; as: ascertainment-corrected

p: disease allele frequency in controls; N: sample size (number of cases and of controls)

Assume testing at significance level α = 10-6