Skip to main content
. 2008 May 15;5(Suppl 1):S59–S69. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0084.focus

Table 1.

A list of some models analysed together with the number of state variables n, the number of parameters s and the rate of decay α of the singular values σi (i.e. log10σiαi). (The superscripts ‘u’ and ‘f’ for the circadian oscillators indicate, respectively, the values for the cases where the oscillator is unforced and forced by light.)

model n s α
Neurospora clock; Leloup et al. (1999) 3 10 0.30u/0.26f
Drosophila clock; Leloup et al. (1999) 10 38 0.24u/0.19f
Drosophila clock; Ueda et al. (2001) 10 55 0.15u/0.20f
Drosophila clock; Tyson et al. (1999) 2 9 0.48u
mammalian clock; Leloup & Goldbeter (2003) 16 53 0.21u/0.17f
mammalian clock; Forger & Peskin (2003) 73 36 1.63f
yeast cell cycle; Tyson et al. (2002) 9 26 0.27
full NF-κB model; Hoffmann et al. (2002) and Nelson (2004) 24 35 0.45
glycolytic oscillations; Ruoff et al. (2003) 9 10 0.44