Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteomics. 2008 Dec 6;72(5):838–852. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2008.11.015

Table 1. A comparison of GPM-archived fragment ion intensities and experimentally-determined fragment ion intensities in MRM transitions designed using the GPM database tool.

Table 1 lists GPM-predicted MRM transitions for several peptides from β-Actin (ACTB, swissprot accession number P60709) and Thrombospondin-1 (THBS1, swissprot accession number P07996), and compares fragment ion intensity values archived in the GPM vs experimentally determined average intensity values and SDs, based on 3 repeat experiments. Whether the peptide is considered unique by the GPM MRM prediction tool is noted in the final column

Protein Peptide Sequence Q1 Q3 Fragment Predicted Average SD Unique?
m/z m/z Type Intensity (GPM) Intensity (Expt.)
ACTB AGFAGDDAPR 488.7 630.3 y6 100 100 0 Y
701.3 y7 46 66.1 0.49 Y
343.2 y3 61 23.8 0.53 N
424.7 y8 33 34.6 0.57 N
276.1 b3 16 60.1 1.72 N
GYSFTTTAER 566.8 437.2 b4-H2O 20 20.2 0.40 Y
308.1 b3 37 62.3 0.28 Y
678.3 y6 100 100 0 N
912.4 y8 77 53.6 2.10 N
577.3 y5 50 52.9 0.22 N
SYELPDGQVITIGNER 895.9 1086.6 y10 13 14.5 0.25 Y
706.4 y132+ 30 83.1 0.72 Y
1298.7 y12 100 46.1 0.16 N
475.2 y4 65 100 0 N
689.4 y6 62 95.1 1.71 N
THBS1 GFLLLASLR 495.3 672.4 y6 41 100 0 Y
318.2 b3 18 85.0 5.47 Y
446.3 y4 100 60.3 8.06 N
559.4 y5 81 68.7 11.0 N
544.3 b5 77 14.9 0.72 N
FVFGTTPEDILR 697.7 742.4 y6 100 100 0 Y
574.8 y102+ 79 84.9 0.40 Y
219.1 a2 87 53.7 1.49 N
688.9 y12-H2O2+ 50 48.4 0.31 N
565.8 y10-H2O2+ 56 29.1 0.89 N
GGVNDNFQGVLQNVR 808.9 1083.5 b11-H2O 12 0 0.18 Y
871.4 b9-H2O 12 1.6 0.51 Y
629.4 y5 100 80.7 0.04 N
913.5 y8 47 50.8 0.48 N
785.5 y7 62 100 0 N