Skip to main content
. 2009 May;214(5):671–678. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01061.x

Table 2.

Correlations for independent contrasts of orientation angles and skull length

Convergence angle
Frontation angle
Clade n r P r P
Extant taxa only
Carnivora 38 0.506 0.001 –0.189 0.263
Caniformia 22 0.138 0.541 –0.236 0.290
Arctoidea 17 0.261 0.311 –0.403 0.110
Feliformia 16 0.546 0.035 –0.188 0.501
All taxa
Carnivora 68 0.057 0.649 0.108 0.389
Caniformia 43 –0.122 0.437 0.296 0.057
Crown-clade Caniformia * 40 –0.126 0.439 0.306 0.058
Canidae 21 0.132 0.569 0.380 0.099
Arctoidea 19 –0.116 0.636 –0.039 0.900
Feliformia 25 0.151 0.480 0.013 0.951
Felidae 7 –0.783 0.065 0.031 0.544
Viverridae, Hyaenidae, ‘Herpestidae’ 11 0.541 0.085 –0.131 0.701
‘Herpestidae’ 6 0.728 0.101 –0.152 0.773
*

Crown-clade Caniformia excludes the Amphicyonidae and is identical to ‘Caniformia’ in the extant-only analysis.

‘Herpestidae’ includes true mongooses and Malagasy carnivorans, as previous analyses include some or all of these taxa in Herpestidae.

In contrast to skull length, no significant correlations exist between encephalization and orbit orientation among extant taxa. When fossil and extant taxa are included in the analysis, no relationships exist between encephalization and either orientation angle, arguing against Carnivora-wide structural relationships between orbit orientation and encephalization (Fig. 3). However, we do observe several significant correlations for analyses among carnivoran subclades when fossil and living taxa are analysed. FA is positively correlated with encephalization for Felidae (Noble et al. 2000) (Table 3), although in our data set this is due to the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus), which stands out as an outlier (Fig. 4). Excluding the cheetah removes the significance (r = 0.320, P = 0.588); therefore this correlation must be viewed with caution until a larger sample is examined.

n, number of taxa; r, Pearson correlation coefficient; P, two-tailed significance. Significant correlations are highlighted in bold. Extant-only analyses are made for a smaller number of taxonomic groups, as sample size precluded finer partitioning.