Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2008 Nov 24;118(24):2550–2554. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.799940

Table 4.

Relationship of Survival to Observation of Gasping by Bystander CPR and Collapse-to-Arrival Time

Survival
Gasping (n) % (n) OR (95% CI)
All cardiac arrest (n=1218)
No (1027) 7.8 (80) 1.00
Yes (191) 28.3 (54) 3.4 (2.2–5.2)
Bystander CPR performed (n)
 Yes (481) No (404) 9.4 (38) 1.00
Yes (77) 39.0 (30) 5.1 (2.7–9.4)
 No (737) No (623) 6.7 (42) 1.00
Yes (114) 21.1 (24) 2.4 (1.2–4.3)*
Collapse-to-arrival time, min (n)
 <7 (363) No (290) 12.8 (37) 1.00
Yes (73) 46.6 (34) 6.0 (3.2–11.1)
 7–9 (360) No (310) 5.8 (18) 1.00
Yes (50) 18.0 (9) 3.8 (1.5–9.9)*
 >9 (338) No (313) 2.9 (9) 1.00
Yes (25) 16.0 (4) 5.7 (1.4–22.0)*
Collapse after EMS arrival (n=119)
No (80) 20.0 (16) 1.00
Yes (39) 17.9 (7) 1.02 (0.3–2.9)

Model is adjusted for age, gender, location of cardiac arrest, bystander CPR performed, collapse-to–EMS-arrival time, VF, and method of professional resuscitation (CPR vs CCR).

*

P<0.01;

P<0.001.