Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov 10;103(2):313–323. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn208

Table 2.

Effect of up to 28 h flooding of the soil on leaf gas exchange of 1-month-old tomato plants

Treatment A (μmol m−2 s−1) Amax (μmol m−2 s−1) Ci (μmol mol−1) gs (mmol m−2 s−1) dA/dCi (μmol m−2 s−1) Γ (μmol mol−1)
WD 0–1 h 11·18 ± 1·22 20·74 ± 1·28 181·75 ± 7·59 196·50 ± 26·53 0·073 ± 0·005 63·63 ± 2·40
FL 1–2 h 11·63 ± 0·72 22·30 ± 1·76 190·00 ± 2·66 222·50 ± 30·95 0·088 ± 0·008 62·73 ± 3·60
WD 2–3 h 10·11 ± 0·59 19·87 ± 1·67 195·57 ± 3·74 196·00 ± 7·07 0·075 ± 0·007 64·96 ± 2·14
FL 3–4 h 10·16 ± 1·12 18·31 ± 2·50 188·43 ± 4·90 194·86 ± 33·31 0·076 ± 0·007 61·37 ± 4·68
WD 4–5 h 10·84 ± 0·69 19·81 ± 1·92 197·86 ± 4·17 221·43 ± 18·97 0·077 ± 0·007 62·19 ± 2·94
FL 5–6 h 10·01 ± 0·65 16·77 ± 1·69 178·43* ± 4·15 165·00* ± 23·1 0·087 ± 0·005 66·12 ± 3·25
WD 24–28 h 11·27 ± 0·82 19·37 ± 1·39 198·27 ± 5·42 232·55 ± 22·35 0·097 ± 0·005 93·49 ± 9·21
FL 24–28 h 4·95* ± 0·58 13·88* ± 2·03 175·36* ± 6·38 69·00* ± 6·51 0·058* ± 0·009 129·85* ± 21·21

Measurements were made on the fifth oldest leaf using a Ciras-1 portable IRGA photosynthesis system. A/Ci curves were generated for well-drained and flooded plants and were used to calculate internal Ci, A, Amax, carboxylation efficiencies (dA/dCi) and the CO2 compensation point (Γ). Estimates of stomatal conductance (gs) were also made with the Ciras system. Results are means of 7–8 replicates with associated s.e.; asterisks indicate significant differences (P = 0·05) between flooded (FL) and well-drained control plants (WD).