Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 16;4(7):e6263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006263

Table 1. Comparative analysis of biochemical characteristics of MIP with other related mycobacteria.

Sr. No. Tests* M. chimaera M. seoulense M. arosiense M. intracellulare MIP M. vaccae M. fortuitum M. smegmatis M. pheli
1 Rate of growth S S S S R R R R R
2 Pigment S S S S N N N N S
3 Temperature
a) 25°C + + + + + + + +
b) 37°C + + + + + + + + +
c) 45°C + + + +
4 Colony type smooth smooth smooth variable smooth smooth smooth smooth rough
5 Growth on MacConkey agar +
6 Growth on 5% NaCl + + + + +
7 Tween 80 hydrolysis (5 days) + + +
9 Urease production + + + +
10 Nitrate reduction + + + +/− + + +
12 Aryl sulfatase (3 days) +
13 Aryl sulfatase (14 days) -na- + + + + +
14 Catalase semi-quantitative + + + + +
15 Heat resistant Catalase + + +/− + + + + +

(R): rapid growers, (N): no pigmentation, (S): scotochromogene, (+): positive, (−): negative, (+/−): presence in some strains of species but not in all, (na): data not available, variable: inconsistent colony type (smooth/rough/translucent/opaque) [* as per the tests performed in Saxena et al. [18], Katoch VM [19] and this study].