Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Neuropsychol. 2009;34(3):272–283. doi: 10.1080/87565640802530961

Figure 2. Cerebellar volume in controls, EMO, and PWS.

Figure 2

Individuals with EMO and those with PWS have significantly smaller cerebellar volumes than the normal weight control siblings (p<0.02 EMO vs. controls; p<0.0005 PWS vs. controls). There is no significant difference in cerebellar volume between individuals with PWS and those with EMO.