Table 2.
Effectiveness for correcting medium to large axial motion from the (a) first reader (total of 69 studies), (b) second reader (total of 84 studies) identified with medium to large axial motion. The difference between STASYS and MoCo is significant (P = 0.0003 for the first reader and 0.0425 for the second reader)
| Effectiveness | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | <0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | ||||||
| STASYS | 47 | 13 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of total | 68.1 | 18.8 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MoCo | 34 | 16 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| % of total | 49.3 | 23.2 | 20.3 | 4.34 | 1.45 | 1.45 |
| (b) | ||||||
| STASYS | 45 | 24 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of total | 53.6 | 28.6 | 15.5 | 1.2 | 0 | 1.2 |
| MoCo | 39 | 25 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| % of total | 46.4 | 29.8 | 20.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |