Table 5.
Direct comparison of the effectiveness for motion correction from the (a) first reader, (b) second reader (% of the studies identified with motion)
| Axial motion correction | Lateral motion correction | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MC = mc | MC > mc | MC < mc | MC = mc | MC > mc | MC < mc | |
| (a) | ||||||
| All motion | 84.3 | 12.3 | 3.4 | 94.6 | 4.4 | 1.0 |
| Medium to large motion | 62.3 | 33.3 | 4.3 | 68.2 | 31.8 | 0.0 |
| (b) | ||||||
| All motion | 79.3 | 13.8 | 6.9 | 89.0 | 7.6 | 3.4 |
| Medium to large motion | 73.8 | 20.2 | 6.0 | 88.1 | 9.5 | 2.4 |
MC = mc, Equivalent; MC > mc, STASYS better than MoCo; and MC < mc, STASYS poorer than MoCo.