Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 28;14(16):2501–2510. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.2501

Table 2.

Statistical results obtained using a supervised neuronal training method for discrimination between CCC and non-malignant liver tissue

Condition True value Prediction P value
Pat. No. 1, non-malignant Normal liver tissue Non-malignant 0.00023
Pat. No. 2, non-malignant Normal liver tissue Non-malignant 0.00023
Pat. No. 3, non-malignant Normal liver tissue Non-malignant 0.00023
Pat. No. 4, non-malignant Normal liver tissue Non-malignant 0.00023
Pat. No. 5, non-malignant Normal liver tissue Non-malignant 0.00023
Pat. No. 6, non-malignant Normal liver tissue Non-malignant 0.00023
Pat. No. 7, non-malignant Normal liver tissue Non-malignant 0.00023
Pat. No. 8, non-malignant Normal liver tissue Non-malignant 0.00023
Pat. No. 1, CCC CCC Malignant 0.00103
Pat. No. 2, CCC CCC Malignant 0.00103
Pat. No. 3, CCC CCC Malignant 0.00103
Pat. No. 4, CCC CCC Malignant 0.00103
Pat. No. 5, CCC CCC Malignant 0.00103
Pat. No. 6, CCC CCC Malignant 0.00103
Pat. No. 7, CCC CCC Malignant 0.16100
Pat. No. 8, CCC CCC Malignant 0.00103
Pat. No. 9, CCC CCC Malignant 0.00103
Pat. No. 10, CCC CCC Malignant 0.00103

Statistical results of the ability to differentiate between normal and malignant liver tissue (CCC) using a supervised neuronal training method. In all cases, a fast and correct differentiation was possible with a high positive (P < 0.001 in 90%) and negative (100%, P < 0.00023) predictive value.