Table 2.
Condition | True value | Prediction | P value |
Pat. No. 1, non-malignant | Normal liver tissue | Non-malignant | 0.00023 |
Pat. No. 2, non-malignant | Normal liver tissue | Non-malignant | 0.00023 |
Pat. No. 3, non-malignant | Normal liver tissue | Non-malignant | 0.00023 |
Pat. No. 4, non-malignant | Normal liver tissue | Non-malignant | 0.00023 |
Pat. No. 5, non-malignant | Normal liver tissue | Non-malignant | 0.00023 |
Pat. No. 6, non-malignant | Normal liver tissue | Non-malignant | 0.00023 |
Pat. No. 7, non-malignant | Normal liver tissue | Non-malignant | 0.00023 |
Pat. No. 8, non-malignant | Normal liver tissue | Non-malignant | 0.00023 |
Pat. No. 1, CCC | CCC | Malignant | 0.00103 |
Pat. No. 2, CCC | CCC | Malignant | 0.00103 |
Pat. No. 3, CCC | CCC | Malignant | 0.00103 |
Pat. No. 4, CCC | CCC | Malignant | 0.00103 |
Pat. No. 5, CCC | CCC | Malignant | 0.00103 |
Pat. No. 6, CCC | CCC | Malignant | 0.00103 |
Pat. No. 7, CCC | CCC | Malignant | 0.16100 |
Pat. No. 8, CCC | CCC | Malignant | 0.00103 |
Pat. No. 9, CCC | CCC | Malignant | 0.00103 |
Pat. No. 10, CCC | CCC | Malignant | 0.00103 |
Statistical results of the ability to differentiate between normal and malignant liver tissue (CCC) using a supervised neuronal training method. In all cases, a fast and correct differentiation was possible with a high positive (P < 0.001 in 90%) and negative (100%, P < 0.00023) predictive value.