TABLE 1.
Performance of recombinant protein (pA104R, p54, pB602L, and pK205R)-based ELISAs compared to that of the conventional ELISA (OIE-ELISA)a
| Assay | % Sensitivity (95% CI) | % Specificity (95% CI) | κ (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| pA104R-ELISA | 79 (69.8-87.7) | 99 (97.5-100) | 0.81 (0.72-0.89) |
| p54-ELISA | 98 (94.1-100) | 97 (94.7-100) | 0.95 (0.90-0.99) |
| pK205R-ELISA | 91 (85.1-97.4) | 99 (97.5-100) | 0.92 (0.86-0.97) |
| pB602L-ELISA | 98 (94.1-100) | 95 (91.0-98.9) | 0.92 (0.86-0.97) |
| OIE-ELISA | 94 (88.4-99.1) | 95 (91.0-98.9) | 0.89 (0.82-0.95) |
a
A total of 199 serum samples (80 positive, 119 negative) from European domestic pigs that had previously been characterized by immunoblotting (OIE reference test) were analyzed.