Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 14;94(7):2313–2320. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2604

Table 2.

Effect of NES and T gel on serum gonadotropins

Group
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
T gel dose (g) 0 0 10 10 10 10 10
NES gel dose (mg) 2 4 0 2 4 6 8
Evaluable (n) 16 16 19 19 15 18 16
d-1 LH (IU/liter)a 3.3 (2.8–4.1) 3.4 (2.1–4.5) 3.7 (3.1–5.5) 3.2 (2.4–4.7) 3.7 (2.6–4.5) 3.6 (2.5–4.7) 3.3 (2.5–4.8)
LH, % decreaseb 41 (18–54) 56 (13–65) 71 (32–85) 85 (55–96) 91 (57–97) 95 (83–97) 96 (89–97)
d-1 FSH (IU/liter)a 3.2 (1.4–3.8) 2.5 (1.7–3.8) 2.4 (2.1–4.8) 2.0 (1.8–3.8) 3.5 (2.4–5.3) 3.2 (2.2–4.3) 3.1 (2.4–3.9)
FSH, % decreaseb 27 (21–35) 37 (29–54) 52 (22–80) 75 (60–89) 76 (42–96) 92 (74–95) 93 (82–96)
Men with d-21 LH and FSH ≤0.5 IU/literc 0, 0 (0–21) 0, 0 (0–21) 4, 21.1 (6–46) 7, 36.8 (16–62) 6, 40.0 (16–68) 11, 61.1 (36–83) 11, 68.8 (41–89)
Men with d-21 LH and FSH ≤1 IU/literc 1, 6.3 (0–30) 2, 12.5 (2–38) 6, 31.6 (13–57) 11, 57.9 (34–80) 8, 53.3 (27–79) 13, 72.2 (47–90) 13, 81.3 (54–96)
a

Results shown as median (first to third quartiles). 

b

Results shown as median (first to third quartiles) for percent decrease from d 1–21; P < 0.05 for percent decreases in all groups. 

c

Results shown as number, percentage, and 95% confidence interval for percentage.