Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 19;69(1-2):133–153. doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9412-7

Table 2.

Results of statistical analysis and mean values of absolute water content, relative water content (RWC), pre-dawn (Ψp) (day 18) and mid-day (Ψm) water potential and osmotic potential (π) in four rice cultivars cultivated under control and drought stress conditions (condition)

GLM Absolute leaf water content RWC Ψp Ψm π
Transformation None None None None None
F p F p F p F p F p
Model 4.99 *** 1.67 n.s. 3.43 * 111.1 *** 10.28 ***
Cultivar 5.31 * 1.64 n.s. 1.23 n.s. 15.27 *** 4.09 *
Condition 16.81 *** 1.15 n.s. 10.22 ** 765.8 *** 46.62 ***
Cultivar × condition 0.73 n.s. 1.89 n.s. 3.65 *. 0.69 n.s. 6.76 **
Comparison of means
Condition Cultivar Mean (g/gDW) P0.1 Mean (%) p0.1 Mean (MPa) p0.1 Mean (MPa) p0.1 Mean (mmol/kg) p0.1
Control NB 2.41 A 93 a −0.14 C −1.17 a 575 b
TP 2.43 A 94 a −0.15 Bc −1.08 ab 592 b
IR 2.66 A 92 a −0.12 Ab −0.96 b 381 a
LC 2.61 A 95 a −0.31 A −0.71 c 648 b
Drought NB 2.20 B 93 A −0.30 A −2.42 A 910 C
TP 2.09 B 94 A −0.25 A −2.35 AB 824 BC
IR 2.31 AB 95 A −0.34 A −2.29 AB 779 B
LC 2.49 A 95 A −0.25 A −2.04 B 637 A

Means were compared by REGWQ-Test (α = 0.1), different letters behind the means values indicate significantly different groups. Data from one experiment, n = 5. n.s. = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001