Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Dermatol. 2009 May 12;161(1):209–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09219.x

Table 2.

Interaction between ICAM5 301 Val>Ile and risk factors on melanoma risk

Val/Val Val/Ile Ile/Ile

Cases/Controls OR (95%CI) Cases/Controls OR (95%CI) Cases/Controls OR (95%CI)
Constitutional susceptibility score 1
Low 15/12 1.00 21/28 0.83 (0.29, 2.35) 6/9 1.02 (0.25, 4.23)
Medium 13/35 0.73 (0.20, 2.68) 26/34 2.15 (0.60, 7.67) 5/12 0.92 (0.19, 4.50)
High 57/21 5.73 (1.62, 20.31) 50/46 1.95 (0.58, 6.63) 20/11 3.10 (0.76, 12.62)
p for interaction = 0.12

Cumulative sun exposure with a bathing suit 2
Low 14/24 1.00 16/33 1.00 (0.38, 2.66) 7/9 0.98 (0.26, 3.65)
Medium 17/18 1.57 (0.57, 4.34) 22/33 1.45 (0.57, 3.68) 8/10 1.96 (0.55, 6.94)
High 38/13 4.83 (1.79, 13.06) 41/29 2.30 (0.94, 5.64) 13/9 2.59 (0.76, 8.80)
p for interaction = 0.34
1

Unconditional logistic regression adjusted for the matching variables, family history of melanoma, number of lifetime severe sunburns, sunlamp use or tanning salon attendance, cumulative sun exposure while wearing a bathing suit, and geographic region.

2

Unconditional logistic regression adjusted for the matching variables, constitutional susceptibility score, family history of melanoma, number of lifetime severe sunburns, sunlamp use or tanning salon attendance, and geographic region.