TABLE 4.
Author | n | Sensitivity | Specificity | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
van Rugge167 | 39 | 91 | 80 | |
Nagel162 | 208 | 86 | 86 | Significantly superior to dobutamine stress echocardiography |
Hundley164 | 153 | 83 | 83 | Patients unsuited for echocardiography |
Paetsch70 | 79 | 89 | 80 | Favorable comparison to perfusion imaging |
Wahl163 | 160 | 89 | 84 | Patients with wall motion abnormalities |
Paetsch165 | 150 | 78 | 87 | Multicenter interpretation |