Table 3.
Summary of F values for significant effects with the ERP methodology (reported in [17]) and the delta wave methodology. Notice that both methodologies were performed on the same data, but the EROs methodology has a better sensitivity/specificity.
| EROs | ERPs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fz | Cz | Pz | Fz | Cz | Pz |
|
| |||||
| Valence by gender (F = 5.398) | Valence (F = 4.378) | Arousal (F = 68.51) | Valence (F = 9.18) | Valence (F = 4.23) | Arousal (F = 13.4) |
| Valence by arousal by gender (F = 5.439) | Arousal by gender (F = 5.824) | Arousal by gender (F = 4.96) | |||
| Gender (F = 7.136) | Gender (F = 6.64) | ||||
| Arousal by gender (F = 13.519) | |||||