Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: Development. 2002 Jun;129(12):2891–2903. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.12.2891

Table 1.

Genotypes of progeny from heterozygous integrin β8 intercrosses

Integrin β8 genotype*
Age +/+ +/− −/− Number of viable −/− Expected number of viable −/− Expected −/− progeny (%)
E9.5 27 (31) 39 (45) 20 (24) 20 22 91
E10.5 48 (24) 101 (50) 52 (26) 41 50 82
E11.5 37 (32) 54 (46) 26 (22)§ 12 30 40
E12.5 23 (25) 52 (57) 16 (18) 9 25 36
E13.5 25 (25) 65 (65) 10 (10) 10 30 33
E14.5 14 (45) 14 (45) 3(10) 3 9 33
E15.5 12 (36) 18 (55) 3 (9) 3 10 30
E16.5 11 (35) 17 (55) 3 (10) 3 9 33
P0–P4 58 (32) 103 (57) 20 (10) 20** 54 36
*

Numbers are given with percentages in brackets.

E, embryonic day; P, postnatal day.

Expected viable −/− calculated as if the sum of (+/+)+(+/−) is 75%.

Heart is beating.

28 embryos had pale yolk sacs; 15 had dilated pericardiac cavities; 6 had no obvious vasculature; 5 had loose allantois-chorion connections.

§

Many embryos were deteriorating or being absorbed.

Two +/+ and two +/− embryos had cleft palate and died. The rest were viable and fertile.

**

Two had a cleft palate. All had intracerebral hemorrhages.