Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul;182(3):889–897. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.101691

TABLE 1.

Deficiency complementation tests

Deficiency breakpoints Mean aggression score (SE)
ANOVA P-values
Deficiency genotype Df/88 MAS Df/Ore MAS Line (L) Genotype (G) L × G
w1118; Df(3L)ED4341/TM6C, Sb1 63F6;64B11 12.1 (1.12) 12.0 (1.21) 0.9820 0.0082 0.9224
w1118; Df(3L)ED4342/TM6C, Sb1 64B1;64B13 15.6 (1.54) 16.1 (1.89) 0.8175 0.8947 0.9054
w1118; Df(3L)ED210/TM6C, Sb1 64B11;64D1 22.0 (1.75) 18.3 (1.86) 0.2237 0.0026 0.1850
w1118; Df(3L)Exel6105/TM6B, Tb1 64D1;64D6 16.9 (0.98) 19.9 (0.66) 0.0499 0.0103 0.4879
w1118; Df(3L)Exel6106/TM6B, Tb1 64D6;64E2 22.8 (1.04) 22.5 (1.83) 0.6360 <0.0001 0.4709
w1118; Df(3L)Exel6107/TM6B, Tb1 64E5;64F5 30.3 (2.30) 21.8 (1.87) 0.0089 <0.0001 0.0003*
w1118; Df(3L)Exel7210/TM6B, Tb1 65A1;65A5 17.5 (0.98) 20.2 (2.23) 0.0997 0.0080 0.6151
w1118; Df(3L)Exel8101/TM6B, Tb1 65A3;65A9 21.1 (1.84) 18.5 (1.46) 0.6404 0.0007 0.1048
w1118; Df(3L)ED211/TM6C, Sb1 65A9;65B4 11.9 (1.57) 11.3 (0.94) 0.8709 0.0036 0.7789
w1118; Df(3L)ED212/TM6C, Sb1 65A9;65D5 21.4 (2.77) 18.8 (1.05) 0.4203 0.0043 0.3622
w1118; Df(3L)Exel6110/TM6B, Tb1 65E4;65E8 16.5 (1.15) 17.0 (1.11) 0.4007 0.2697 0.6828
w1118; Df(3L)Exel6111/TM6B, Tb1 65E7;65F4 24.3 (1.24) 16.9 (1.02) 0.0114 <0.0001 0.0002*
w1118; Df(3L)Exel8104/TM6B, Tb1 65F7;66A4 19.3 (1.63) 15.7 (1.16) 0.4032 0.1167 0.0519
w1118; Df(3L)ED4408/TM6C, Sb1 66A22;66C5 12.8 (1.32) 10.2 (1.44) 0.3737 0.0032 0.3146
w1118; Df(3R)Exel7317/TM6B, Tb1 66C5;66D3 17.8 (0.88) 16.2 (1.12) 0.9453 0.1820 0.1838
w1118; Df(3L)ED4421/TM6C, Sb1 66D14;67B1 11.9 (1.89) 8.8 (1.89) 0.3173 0.0005 0.2679
w1118; Df(3L)Exel6114/TM6B, Tb1 67B10;67C5 18.5 (1.21) 15.3 (0.87) 0.4438 0.2143 0.0450
w1118; Df(3L)Exel9048/TM6B, Tb1 67D1;67D2 32.2 (1.33) 18.1 (1.27) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001*
w1118; Df(3L)ED4470/TM6C, Sb1 68A6;68E1 14.0 (1.86) 11.6 (2.20) 0.4551 0.0590 0.3935
w1118; Df(3L)ED4483/TM6C, Sb1 69A4;69D3 17.7 (1.17) 17.0 (2.03) 0.8489 0.2353 0.7615
w1118; Df(3L)ED215/TM6C, Sb1 69B5;69C4 16.9 (1.93) 10.9 (0.72) 0.0372 0.2946 0.0282
w1118; Df(3L)ED4486/TM6C, Sb1 69C4;69F6 23.9 (2.16) 14.3 (1.59) 0.0018 0.0212 0.0013*
w1118; Df(3L)Exel6261/TM6B, Tb1 69F6;70A3 18.5 (1.44) 15.8 (1.09) 0.5931 0.1556 0.0805
w1118; Df(3L)ED4502/TM6C, Sb1 70A3;70C10 14.9 (1.08) 20.3 (1.45) 0.0424 0.1539 0.0554
w1118; Df(3L)ED4543/TM6C, Sb1 70C6;70F4 14.6 (2.34) 11.9 (1.18) 0.3929 0.1078 0.3366
w1118; Df(3L)ED217/TM6C, Sb1 70F4;71E1 20.0 (1.75) 17.8 (1.43) 0.4725 0.0267 0.4068
w1118; Df(3L)ED218/TM6C, Sb1 71B1;71E1 17.6 (0.90) 15.6 (0.91) 0.4800 0.4708 0.4072
w1118 (Exel control) N/A 14.8 (0.67) 16.2 (0.96) N/A N/A N/A
w1118 (ED control) N/A 15.6 (0.80) 15.7 (1.16) N/A N/A N/A

Deficiency stocks used in quantitative complementation tests. ED denotes DrosDel deficiencies and Exel indicates Exelixis deficiencies. The isogenic background stocks for both sets of deficiencies are listed as controls. Boldface type indicates deficiencies that failed to complement the QTL for aggressive behavior (P-values of the L × G term from ANOVA < 0.05). *Significant following a Bonferroni correction for multiple tests. Df(3L)ED4502 (results in italics) was marginally significant and was therefore included in complementation tests to mutations.