Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 2;101(9):1379–1389. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn047

Table 1.

Summary of mean values (±s.e.) for characteristics of mature leaves of monocots and dicots at various sites

Dry mass per unit leaf area (mg cm−2) Nitrogen concentration (mg g−1 dry mass) Water concentration (g g−1 dry mass)
Australia: low-rainfall site
 Monocots 6·70 ± 2·15 23·9 ± 3·59 4·0 ± 1·1
 Dicots 5·17 ± 0·50 28·2 ± 4·78 3·0 ± 0·5
Australia: high-rainfall site
 Monocots 5·35 ± 0·19*** 18·3 ± 0·90 3·3 ± 0·6
 Dicots 7·0 ± 0·31 19·1 ± 1·1 2·1 ± 0·1
Singapore
 Monocots ND 25·7 ± 3·03 ND
 Dicots ND 17·9 ± 1·18 ND
Uganda
 Monocots 3·88 ± 0·28* 26·3 ± 2·01 4·2 ± 1·1
 Dicots 5·18 ± 0·37 26·1 ± 1·35 2·4 ± 0·25
Costa Rica
 Monocots 4·86 ± 0·53 19·5 ± 2·36* 3·4 ± 0·43
 Dicots 3·78 ± 0·23 27·2 ± 1·9 3·2 ± 0·37
Panama
 Monocots 4·34 ± 0·35 ND 1·8 ± 0·48
 Dicots 5·16 ± 0·49 ND 2·4 ± 0·45

Primary data are given in Appendix 2.

The cases where monocots and dicots at a site were statistically different (two-tailed t-test) are indicated: *P < 0·05; ***P < 0·001.

ND, not determined.