Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 18;101(9):1413–1420. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn053

Table 1.

Location and characteristics of the eight Erysimum mediohispanicum populations studied in the Sierra Nevada during 2005 and 2006

Population Latitude (N) Longitude (W) Habitat Altitude Abundance (± s.e.)* Sobs (95 % CI) Most abundant flower visitors
08 37°8·00′ 3°25·91′ Shrubland 1690 0·77 ± 0·07c 33ab (22·6–41·4) Large bees, bee-flies
21 37°8·07′ 3°25·71′ Forest 1723 1·60 ± 0·14a 37b (27·3–46·7) Small bees, bee-flies
01 37°8·00′ 3°25·69′ Forest 1750 0·64 ± 0·07c 36cd (25·4–46·7) Large bees, bee-flies, beetles
22 37°7·86′ 3°25·70′ Forest 1802 0·77 ± 0·07c 32cd (22·7–41·3) Bee-flies, small bees
23 37°7·74′ 3°25·58′ Shrubland 1874 0·97 ± 0·12b,c 39ce (29·1–48·9) Large bees, beetles
24 37°7·51′ 3°26·14′ Forest 1943 0·73 ± 0·10c 30abc (20·1–39·5) Large bees, beetles, small bees
25 37°7·27′ 3°26·05′ Shrubland 2064 0·82 ± 0·10c 32de (22·8–41·2) Large bees, small bees, beetles
02 37°7·33′ 3°25·86 Shrubland 2099 1·30 ± 0·12ab 41ad (31·1–50·9) Beetles

* Abundance is expressed as visits per flower h–1, and was compared between populations by one-way random ANOVA (Gómez et al., 2007).

Sobs is the observed number of pollinator species per population (observed species richness), and was compared between populations by rarefaction (Gómez et al., 2007).

Based in the relative abundance of each functional group (Gómez et al., unpubl. res.).