Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 18;101(9):1413–1420. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn053

Summary of multiple-response-curves fitting of each pollinator group to Erysimum mediohispanicum phenotypic traits at the plant individual level. Figures are estimates ± s.e. from multiple Poisson regressions performed separately for each plant population

Plant populations
Em08 Em21 Em01 Em22 Em23 Em24 Em25 Em02
Small bees
Stalk height 0·01 ± 0·02 –0·01 ± 0·01 –0·08 ± 0·03** –0·07 ± 0·03* –0·01 ± 0·02 0·00 ± 0·03 –0·02 ± 0·03 –0·07 ± 0·04*
Flower number 0·00 ± 0·01 0·01 ± 0·01* 0·01 ± 0·00* 0·02 ± 0·01* 0·01 ± 0·00**** 0·02 ± 0·01**** 0·04 ± 0·01*** 0·01 ± 0·00****
Corolla tube width 0·19 ± 0·59 0·74 ± 0·23** 1·67 ± 0·60** –0·68 ± 0·64 –0·99 ± 0·69 –0·18 ± 0·55 0·71 ± 0·84 0·39 ± 0·46
Corolla diameter 0·08 ± 0·24 –0·18 ± 0·11 –0·14 ± 0·26 0·36 ± 0·33 0·74 ± 0·36* 0·15 ± 0·25 –0·11 ± 0·45 –0·29 ± 0·25
Corolla tube length –0·24 ± 0·27 –0·23 ± 0·09* –0·12 ± 0·22 0·00 ± 0·23 –0·10 ± 0·23 0·28 ± 0·19 –0·15 ± 0·24 0·47 ± 0·20*
Beetles
Stalk height 0·01 ± 0·01 0·02 ± 0·02 –0·05 ± 0·02**** 0·01 ± 0·03 0·01 ± 0·02 –0·07 ± 0·04 –0·07 ± 0·03** –0·03 ± 0·02
Flower number 0·01 ± 0·01 0·00 ± 0·01 0·01 ± 0·00**** 0·01 ± 0·01 0·00 ± 0·00 0·02 ± 0·01** 0·02 ± 0·01* 0·01 ± 0·00*
Corolla tube width –0·43 ± 0·47 0·59 ± 0·46 0·14 ± 0·44 0·40 ± 0·64 0·56 ± 0·51 –0·21 ± 0·77 0·00 ± 0·48 –0·34 ± 0·29
Corolla diameter 0·33 ± 0·23 0·20 ± 0·23 1·64 ± 0·55**** –0·13 ± 0·30 –0·31 ± 0·29 –0·32 ± 0·43 0·23 ± 0·27 0·11 ± 0·15
Corolla tube length –0·23 ± 0·18 –0·67 ± 0·22*** 0·50 ± 0·14**** 0·30 ± 0·20 –0·02 ± 0·14 1·27 ± 0·37**** –0·10 ± 0·20 0·00 ± 0·11
Wasps
Stalk height 0·02 ± 0·02 0·11 ± 0·16 0·14 ± 0·21 0·02 ± 0·06 0·00 ± 0·08 0·84 ± 0·39****
Flower number 0·02 ± 0·01 –0·05 ± 0·12 0·02 ± 0·07 0·01 ± 0·01 0·04 ± 0·02*** 0·04 ± 0·05
Corolla tube width 0·86 ± 0·57 2·18 ± 3·18 0·77 ± 6·03 5·35 ± 1·88**** 0·52 ± 1·30 1·79 ± 2·29
Corolla diameter –0·08 ± 0·26 1·14 ± 1·73 –1·27 ± 2·93 2·08 ± 0·82*** –0·96 ± 0·64 3·27 ± 1·72*
Corolla tube length –0·28 ± 0·22 –0·68 ± 1·17 0·05 ± 1·83 0·76 ± 0·61 0·51 ± 0·49 –3·51 ± 1·72**
Other
Stalk height –0·36 ± 0·26*** –0·04 ± 0·05 0·00 ± 0·03 0·14 ± 0·11 –0·26 ± 0·14**
Flower number 0·13 ± 0·09** 0·04 ± 0·03 0·02 ± 0·01*** 0·05 ± 0·03* 0·01 ± 0·02
Corolla tube width 6·53 ± 4·58** 2·24 ± 1·37 1·30 ± 0·82 0·60 ± 0·94 –1·12 ± 0·84
Corolla diameter –1·45 ± 1·04 –0·04 ± 0·56 –0·53 ± 0·33 0·39 ± 0·64 0·77 ± 0·54
Corolla tube length 0·39 ± 0·87 –0·31 ± 0·46 0·30 ± 0·30 –1·84 ± 0·94** –0·72 ± 0·57

Only pollinator functional groups showing a significant population × plant phenotype interaction term are shown.

Cells without data were a consequence of a singularity in the data matrix (with Hessian not positive definite), which produce failure in the convergence process. This was most likely due to a poor fit of the model or to linear dependencies among model covariates, probably as a consequence of low abundance of pollinators in those populations that generate over-dispersion.

* P <0·05, ** P <0·01, *** P <0·001, **** P <0·0001.