Table 2.
Direct
methods
|
Indirect methods* | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Urea melting† | Competition HX‡ | Native-state HX§ | ||
ΔGIU | −0.6 | ∼0.0 | 0.3 | 2.7 to 3.2 |
Values are 2.8 kcal/mol from Dalby et al. (24), 2.7 kcal/mol from the chevron plot fitting that used a three-state model with fixed intermediate and transition state (see Materials and Methods and Fig. 1), and 3.2 kcal/mol from Matouschek et al. (1).
The value was obtained by fitting the CD signals (Fig. 3C) to a two-state model with floating parameters for both pretransition and posttransition baselines (Eq. 4). If KIU is fixed with a value of 0.25 (ΔGIU = 0.8 kcal/mol), the fitting yields an mIU value that is 60% of the mNU value for global unfolding (20). This value is significantly larger than the 43% value obtained from the chevron curve fitting (see Fig. 1), indicating that the ΔGIU is unlikely larger than 0.8 kcal/mol.
This value was obtained assuming an average protection factor of 2 (Fig. 2). Simulation studies that use Eq. 5 show that a ±10% error in Pocc(H) measurement may contribute an error less than a factor of 2 in Pf, which may contribute an uncertainty in ΔGIU by ∼0.4 kcal/mol.
The value was calculated from ΔGuapp – ΔGHX (see text) based on the HX data of Clarke and Fersht (9). Possible uncertainties in kint by a factor of 2 may contribute another error in free energy by 0.4 kcal/mol. Thus, the ΔGIUs determined from both HX experiments are unlikely larger than 0.8 kcal/mol.