Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul;64(7):683–689. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322009000700013

Table 2.

Means, standard deviations and statistical results for the measurements of slow vital capacity (SVC) and maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) for both the experimental and predicted values, for the group treated with conventional chest physiotherapy (CCP) and the group treated with CCP + transcutaneous electric diaphragmatic stimulation (TEDS), in three evaluations.

Variables Intervention Preoperative 15 days 30 days
SVC (L) CCP Experimental
% of predict
3.0 ± 0.4
92.5 ± 11.3
3.1 ± 0.4
105.7 ± 12
3.2 ± 0.4
97.2 ± 12
CCP+TEDS Experimental
% of predict
3.2 ± 0.5
97.5 ± 12.7
3.1 ± 0.5
95.4 ± 14.2
3.3 ± 0.5
99.6 ± 12.1
MVV (L/min) CCP Experimental
% of predict
101 ± 18
97.4 ± 19
105 ± 14
95.5 ± 10,4
104 ± 16
100 ±16.3
CCP + TEDS Experimental
% of predict
107 ± 22
102.6 ± 16.5
104 ± 27
100.1 ± 22.8
111 ± 25
106.1 ± 20.5

There was no statistical difference between any of the variables