Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2008 Aug;60(2):479–484. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21692

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The ratio of the average pass-band signal to the average stop-band signal was simulated for a range of T1/T2 ratios, flip angles and various suppression methods: (displayed in logarithmic scale) a: FS-ATR, b: LCSSFP, c: ψ2i,o=(45°,45°) and d: ψ2i,o=(45°,135°). The proposed method (ψ2i,o=(45°,135°)) achieves better suppression than LCSSFP for the whole range of simulation parameters except in the small vicinity of α = 30°. The performance of the proposed method improves with increasing flip angle. The signal ratio of FS-ATR is lower compared to the multiple-acquisition methods.