Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul;11(4):266–278. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080125

Table 2.

Comparison of Quantitative MSP and MIP Assays for Quantitative Assessment of CpG Methylation

Methylation-specific quantitative PCR (MethyLight, etc.) Methylation-independent PCR (for subsequent pyrosequencing, mass spectrometry, COBRA, etc.)
Basic characteristics Quantification during PCR Quantification after PCR; not specific for the methylated or unmethylated sequences
Paraffin-embedded tissue Usable Usable
Precision Good Good, especially at high-level methylation
Accuracy Good Good, especially at high-level methylation
Monitoring of complete bisulfite conversion By amplification of a non-CpG genomic reference* By the presence of non-CpG cytosine in templates that should be completely converted
Genomic reference to measure the amount of input bisulfite-converted DNA Necessary* Unnecessary (measuring both methylated and unmethylated sequences)
Resolution Lower; block of CpG sites coincident with primer and/or probe sequences Very high (single nucleotide level)
Analytical sensitivity Very high (1% methylated sequence) 2% to10% methylated sequence (depending on subsequent detection method)
PCR design Easy for high density CpG sites (applicable to most CpG islands) Easy when there is a small CpG island abutted by CpG sparse areas. CpG sites within PCR primers must be limited
Closed system versus opening of PCR tubes PCR tubes always closed Opening of PCR tubes usually necessary
Samples for standard curves Necessary Unnecessary
PCR bias Specific for methylated sequence by definition Need to minimize PCR bias between methylated and unmethylated sequences
*

Some variants of real-time PCR assays do not require a genomic reference.