Panel 1 |
c.−81A>G (detectable by Panel 2) |
c.−80T>C |
Homozygous c.−81A>G causes a strong mismatch at the 3′ end of an extension primer for c.−80T>C |
DNA sequencing focusing on c.−80T>C |
Panel 2 |
c.19G>A (Hb C) and c.20A>T (Hb S) (detectable by both Panels 1 and 2) |
c.27_28insG |
Homozygous c.19G>A and c.20A>T result in a mismatched site at the 9th and 8th base respectively from 3′ end of primer for c.27_28insG whose length is only 14 bases. The primer is furthermore at a disadvantage in competition for the same template region with the other two for c.19 and c.20 |
DNA sequencing focusing on c.27_28insG or rechecking it by exclusion of primers for c.19G>A and c.20A>T from Panel 2 |
|
c.92 + 5G>C (detectable by Panel 1) |
c.92 + 1G>T |
Homozygous c.92 + 5G>C has a base mismatch at the 4th base from 3′ end of a primer for c.92 + 1G>T |
DNA sequencing focusing on c.92 + 1G>T |
Panel 3 |
c.19G>A (Hb C) (detectable by both Panels 1 and 2) |
c.20A>T (Hb S) |
Homozygous c.19G>A has a mismatch at 3′ end of extension primer for c.20A>T (only in this panel) |
c.20A>T (Hb S) can be detected in Panel 1 and 2 without this interference (different primer is used) |