Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul;11(4):334–346. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080151

Table 6.

Cost Comparison between MALDI-TOF Genotyping and Conventional Methods Used for HBB Genotyping in this Study

MALDI-TOF genotyping
Conventional method
1 Panel 2 Panels 3 Panels DGGE RFLP DNA Sequencing
Number of detectable mutations 21 30 30* 18 1 (Hb E) 11
Percent total HBB alleles in Thai population 95% 99.5% 99.5* % 65% 30% 4.5%
Analysis time (h) 22 22 22 17 22 14
Reagent cost ($)
 DNA preparation 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
 PCR 1.25 1.25 1.25 7.50 (1.25 × 6) 1.25 7.50 (1.25 × 6)
 Post-PCR 3.75 7.50 11.25 0.75 52.50
 Analysis step 2.00 4.00 6.00 2.50 7.50
 Total cost 12.00 17.80 23.50 15.00 7.00 72.50
Cost ($) per mutation 0.57 0.59 0.78 0.83 7.00 6.60
Average for 30 mutations = 0.69 Average for 30 mutations = 3.15
*

Optional for specific confirmation of c.20A>T (Hb S), c.52A>T, and c.441_442insAC.

HBB mutations requiring DNA sequencing analysis are c.−137C>A, c.2T>G, c.5T>C (Hb Raleigh), c.19G>A (Hb C), c.20A>T (Hb S), c.20A>C (Hb G Makassar), c.46delT, C.251G>A (Hb Pyrgos), c.364G>C (Hb D Punjab), c.380T>G (Hb Dhonburi), and c.410G>A (Hb Hope).