Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 8;96(7):2689–2695. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12.3931

Table 1.

Effect of PLL length on the residence time τD of Rh-PE

Number N τD (μs) DM (μm2/s)
1 Control 0 777 ± 39 8.1 ± 0.4
2 L-lysine 1 735 ± 37 8.5 ± 0.4
3 Pentalysine 5 1176 ± 59 5.4 ± 0.3
4 PLL 20 1870 ± 94 3.4 ± 0.2
5 PLL (unilateral) 126 1763 ± 88 3.6 ± 0.2
6 +PLL (bilateral) 126 3576 ± 179 1.8 ± 0.1
7 +1 M KCl 126 1278 ± 64 4.9 ± 0.2

Except number 5, PLL was present in both compartments. Numbers 5–7 denote subsequent additions. The conditions were as noted in Fig. 1.

PLL, poly-lysine; τD, residence time in the focus; Rh-PE, rhodamine labeled phosphatidylethanolamine; N, number of lysine units; DM, lipid diffusion coefficient.