Figure 3.

Simulated curves to explain the observed anomalous q² dependence of NpHR. (a) The curve of (i) simulates the δn₃exp(−k′₃t) term of Eq. 3; (ii) (dotted line) and (iii) (broken line) are calculated curves by −0.2δn₃exp(−k_Xt), where (ii) k_X⁻¹ = 0.7 ms,and (iii) k_X⁻¹ = 0.4 ms as representative curves at smaller and larger q², respectively. (b) Calculated TG signals by taking the sum of (i) and (ii) (dotted line), and (i) and (iii) (broken line).