Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2009 Jun 3;96(11):4672–4680. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.007

Two-Electron Reactions S2QBS0QB and S3QBS1QB are Involved in Deactivation of Higher S States of the Oxygen-Evolving Complex of Photosystem II

Taras K Antal 1, Päivi Sarvikas 1, Esa Tyystjärvi 1,
PMCID: PMC2711488  PMID: 19486689

Abstract

The oxygen-evolving complex of Photosystem II cycles through five oxidation states (S0S4), and dark incubation leads to 25% S0 and 75% S1. This distribution cannot be reached with charge recombination reactions between the higher S states and the electron acceptor QB. We measured flash-induced oxygen evolution to understand how S3 and S2 are converted to lower S states when the electron required to reduce the manganese cluster does not come from QB. Thylakoid samples preconditioned to make the concentration of the S1 state 100% and to oxidize tyrosine YD were illuminated by one or two laser preflashes, and flash-induced oxygen evolution sequences were recorded at various time intervals after the preflashes. The distribution of the S states was calculated from the flash-induced oxygen evolution pattern using an extended Kok model. The results suggest that S2 and S3 are converted to lower S states via recombination from S2QB and S3QB and by a slow change of the state of oxygen-evolving complex from S3 and S2 to S1 and S0 in reactions with unspecified electron donors. The slow pathway appears to contain two-electron routes, S2QBS0QB, and S3QBS1QB. The two-electron reactions dominate in intact thylakoid preparations in the absence of chemical additives. The two-electron reaction was replaced by a one-electron-per-step pathway, S3QBS2QBS1QB in PS II-enriched membrane fragments and in thylakoids measured in the presence of artificial electron acceptors. A catalase effect suggested that H2O2 acts as an electron donor for the reaction S2QBS0QB but added H2O2 did not enhance this reaction.

Introduction

The oxidation of water to molecular oxygen takes place in the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC), a functional part of Photosystem II (PS II) (1,2). OEC consists of an Mn4O4Ca cluster, its ligands, and tyrosine YZ of polypeptide D1 (3–5). The light-induced charge separation in the reaction center of PS II generates the strongly oxidizing cation radical P680+• that oxidizes the manganese complex via YZ. To split water, OEC accumulates four positive equivalents, cycling successively through the redox states denoted S0, S1, S2, S3, and S4, where S0 and S4 are the most reduced and the most oxidized state, respectively (6). The S4 state is unstable and decays rapidly into the S0 state, and the liberation of oxygen occurs during the S3-S4-S0 transition.

Flash-induced oxygen evolution shows a damped period four oscillation on illumination of PS II with a train of short saturating flashes (6,7). The damping occurs because electron transfer from manganese to QB is not completed in some reaction centers after a saturating flash (miss) and because one flash can induce two cycles of electron transfer reactions (double hit) (6,8). Distribution of the S states of OEC can be evaluated from the flash-induced oxygen evolution sequence by using a model introduced by Kok et al. (6), assuming that the miss probability is equal for all S states. An alternative model with unequal miss probabilities has been proposed, and also this model showed a good fit to experimental data (9,10). A special case of models with unequal miss probabilities is a model in which misses can occur only during one S state transition whereas the other S state transitions occur without misses (9). We will call this a one-miss model.

During dark adaptation of several minutes, all higher S states deactivate to the S1 state that is stable in the dark (7). S2 and S3 states can be reduced in ∼30 s by charge recombination reactions with the quinone electron acceptor QB and by a fast (a few seconds) but minor pathway in which tyrosine YDred of polypeptide D2 acts as an electron donor (11–13). In addition, cytochrome b559 has been proposed to be an electron donor to the higher S states (14,15). When the acceptor side of PS II, including QB, is oxidized, the decay half time of the higher S states increases three- to fourfold (16). Styring and Rutherford (17) examined the deactivation of higher S states in PS II enriched membranes in which both YD and the PS II acceptor side were oxidized. Under these circumstances, higher S states deactivated slowly in 3–4 min, and S3 decayed in a one-electron-per-step pathway via S2. However, some electron acceptors like parabenzoquinone (PPBQ) used in Styring and Rutherford (17) to oxidize the PS II acceptor side, have been shown to destabilize the deactivation process of OEC (18,19). In measurements from PS II enriched membranes in the absence of electron acceptors, the decay of the S2 state seemed to be independent of the decay of the S3 state (20). There are no earlier thorough studies of the slow deactivation mechanism in thylakoid membranes or in other preparations in the absence of artificial electron acceptors. Moreover, it is not clear what types of electron donors are responsible for the reduction of the Mn cluster during the conversion of S3 and S2 to lower S states when the PS II center does not have QB.

In this study, we aimed to clarify the mechanism of deactivation of the S3 and S2 states into lower S states in PS II of thylakoid preparations. For this, we evaluated the kinetics of S state redistribution in thylakoid membranes in the dark after one or two short laser flashes (preflashes). The flash-induced oxygen evolution pattern was measured at various time intervals after the preflash(es) and analyzed with an extended one-miss model that also included slow inactivation of PS II during a prolonged flash sequence. The kinetics of S state redistribution was fitted by a model that assumed that S2QB and S3QB decay to S1QB and S2QB, respectively. Two mechanisms were tested for the decay of S2QB and S3QB. The first one is represented by successive one-electron-per-step decay of S3QB via S2QB to S1QB whereas the second mechanism assumes the two-electron transitions S2QBS0QB and S3QBS1QB. The data show that two-electron reactions occur in the absence of chemical additives, whereas the one-electron-per-step mechanism becomes predominant in the presence of electron acceptors, such as 2,6-dichlorobenzoquinone (DCBQ) and dichlorophenol-indophenol (DCPIP). The one-electron-per-step pathway was predominant also in PS II membrane fragment preparations. Water and hydrogen peroxide were examined as possible sources of electrons for the two-electron reactions of deactivation.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of thylakoid membranes and membrane fragments enriched in PS II (BBY-particles)

Pumpkin plants were grown at the photosynthetic photon flux density of 150 μmol m−2 s−1 in a 12-h day/night rhythm. Thylakoids were isolated according to Hakala et al. (21) and stored at −70°C until use. For the experimental treatments, thylakoids (4 mg chlorophyll (Chl) ml−1) were thawed in the dark on ice and suspended in PS II measurement buffer containing 40 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.6; 0.33 M sorbitol, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM NaCl, 1 M glycine betaine, 1 mM KH2PO4, and 5 mM NH2Cl.

PS II-enriched membrane fragments (BBY-particles) were isolated essentially according to Berthold et al. (22) as follows. Leaves were homogenized in cold buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 0.4 M NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2,1 mM EDTA, and 0.2% BSA, and the homogenate was filtered through Miracloth (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany) and centrifuged for 10 min at 200 × g at 4°C. The supernatant was centrifuged for 10 min at 1000 × g and the pellet was suspended in small amount of a second buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 4 mM MgCl2), pelleted (10 min 5000 × g) and resuspended in 50 mM MES, pH 6.1, 15 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM ascorbic acid. The chlorophyll concentration of the homogenate was adjusted to 2 mg/mL, 25% Triton X-100 was added slowly to yield 1:20 Chl/Triton-X ratio (w/w) and the homogenate was incubated for 30 min in darkness on ice under constant stirring. Subsequently, the homogenate was centrifuged for 30 s at 200 × g. The supernatant was centrifuged for 30 min at 30,000 × g, and the pellet was washed twice by centrifugation (30,000 × g, 30 min) in buffer containing 50 mM MES, pH 6.0, 0.4 M sucrose, and 10 mM NaCl. Finally, BBY-particles were resuspended in the same buffer. BBY particles containing 2.5 mg Chl/mL were stored at −70°C.

Measurement of flash-induced O2 evolution

Flash-induced O2 evolution was measured with a Joliot-type bare platinum electrode (23). Flashes (4 ns, 12 mJ/pulse, 532 nm) were fired by an Nd/YAG laser (Minilite, Continuum, Santa Clara, CA) at the repetition rate of 1 flash/s. A lens was set over the electrode to defocus the laser beam on a surface of 5 mm2. The amplified amperometric signals from the oxygen electrode were recorded with a personal computer.

Thylakoid membranes were thawed in the dark on ice and suspended in PS II measurement buffer (0.8 mg Chl/mL). In all measurements, OEC was synchronized to state S1 with oxidized YD (S1YDox thylakoids) by placing the sample on the electrode and treating it according to the following protocol: 5 min darkness–one flash–10 min darkness–one flash–15 min darkness. Thereafter the polarization voltage (−710 mV) of the oxygen electrode was switched on and one or two preflashes were fired, as indicated in each experiment. Reagents like exogenous electron acceptors were added 3 min before the preflashes, as indicated, and the sample was kept in the dark for a period specific for each experiment. Finally, flash-induced O2 evolution pattern was measured using a train of 15 flashes. All measurements were done at 22°C.

Evaluation of S-state distribution

Flash-induced O2 evolution was analyzed with a model that is an extension of the classical Kok scheme of oxygen evolution (6). The model assumes that all misses occur during one S-state transition, S3S0, and the miss probability was assumed to be zero during all other transitions (one-miss model). The double hit probability was assumed to be zero because one 4-ns flash can only induce one turnover of PS II. The model was also extended to include nonspecific decrease in O2 evolving activity during the measurement of the flash oxygen sequence; such slow inactivation is frequently observed in subcellular preparations in the absence of artificial electron acceptors (24).

Modeling deactivation of higher S states

The kinetics of the deactivation of the S2 and S3 states was analyzed assuming that the deactivation of the S2 and S3 states in centers with reduced QB occurs via reactions of charge recombination: S2QBS1QB, S3QBS2QB, whereas states S2QB and S3QB may decay either via a one-electron-per-step route, S3QBS2QBS1QB or via a mixed route involving both one and two-electron reactions, S2QBS0QB, S2QBS1QB and S3QBS1QB (Fig. 1). All modeling, including the analysis of the flash-induced oxygen evolution pattern, was done with the ModelMaker 4 software (Cherwell Scientific, Oxford, UK).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Scheme of S state transitions induced by one or two preflashes (A) and transitions occurring during consequent dark deactivation in PS II centers according to the classical one-electron-per-step mechanism (B) and according to the proposed two-electron mechanism (C). Before the preflashes were fired, all PS II centers were assumed to be in the S1YDox state with 20% QB and 80% QB. In B and C, one-electron and two-electron reactions occurring during deactivation of states S2QB and S3QB are shown with solid and dashed arrows, respectively, and charge recombination of pairs S2QB and S3QB is indicated by dotted arrows.

Hydrogen peroxide assay

Hydrogen peroxide was quantified using Amplex UltraRed reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), which in the presence of peroxidase reacts with H2O2 and produces highly fluorescent resorufin. The excitation and emission maxima of resorufin fluorescence are 576 and 581 nm, respectively. For the assay, a thylakoid sample was first treated with flashes as indicated for each experiment. Then, horseradish peroxidase (1 μM) and Amplex UltraRed (5 μM) were added to 100 μL of the thylakoid sample, and the sample was incubated for 10 min in the dark to allow the deactivation of the higher S states to occur. The sample was then centrifuged at 22,000 × g for 8 min at 4°C to remove thylakoids. Fifty microliters of supernatant was diluted by 450 μL of 40 mM HEPES (pH 7.6). Resorufin fluorescence was excited with a KL-1500 light source (Schott, Mainz, Germany) through a 550 nm short-pass filter (Corion, Newport Corporation, Franklin, MA). Fluorescence emission was measured with an Ocean Optics S2000 spectrometer through a high-pass 600 nm cutoff filter (Corion). The height of the emission peak at 600 nm, precalibrated versus H2O2 concentration, was used to quantify H2O2 from the samples. All measurements were carried out in darkness or in dim green light.

Measurement of delayed light emission

Delayed light emission was measured at 20°C with a home-made luminometer described earlier (25). In this experiment, all flash treatments were done with a FX-200 Xenon flash lamp using the flash energy of 1 J.

Results and discussion

Analysis of flash-induced O2 evolution

The modeling of the changes in S state populations occurring during dark incubation after one or two preflashes (Fig. 1) was based on analysis of flash-induced O2 evolution patterns. Assumptions about the miss parameter are crucial for this analysis. In the classical Kok scheme, the probability of misses is assumed to be equal for each S state transition (6). This model shows good fit to experimental data when double hits are assumed to occur. Double hits reflect actual double turnovers of OEC during a “long” (μs range) flash from a Xenon lamp, and the use of shorter flashes diminishes double hits (26). In our experiments, the probability of double hits was zero because 4-ns laser flashes are too short to induce double turnovers. However, omission of double hits makes the model for the flash oxygen sequence simpler and therefore less flexible than models containing double hits (27). Because of the reduced flexibility, we found it no longer possible to fit the oxygen sequences if the miss probability was the same for all S states. Therefore, we tested more complex models, assuming that the miss probability is different for each S state transition (9,10).

From the viewpoint of modeling, the assumption that the miss probability is unequal is problematic, because unequal miss probabilities make the oxygen sequence underdetermined (28) and therefore the same sequence can be fitted with several different distributions of the miss probability. However, direct estimation of the miss probability of each S state transition with EPR spectroscopy has given strong evidence recently favoring the idea that the miss probability is different for different S state transitions (G. Han, S. Styring, F. Mamedov, Uppsala University, Sweden, personal communication, 2008). In our modeling, we tested various models with unequal miss probabilities, and the best fit was obtained when all misses were assumed to occur during one specific S state transition, whereas the miss probabilities of all other transitions were set to zero (one-miss model (9)). Models assuming that the miss occurs during S0S1, S1S2, S2S3, or S3S0 showed the same goodness of fit but predicted different initial distributions of the S states (Table 1). The option that the miss occurs during the S0S1 transition was excluded because this model predicted an unrealistic initial population of S states (Table 1). The three other models predicted that ∼95% of OEC was initially in the S1 state in dark-adapted S1YDox thylakoids, and we chose to assume that the miss occurs during the S3S0 transition. The assumption excludes misses during illumination of a dark-adapted sample by one or two flashes. A typical flash-induced O2 evolution pattern measured from S1YDox thylakoids after two preflashes followed by a 10-min dark adaptation is shown in Fig. 2 (curve 2) together with the fit obtained with the one-miss model.

Table 1.

Parameters calculated by fitting flash-induced O2 evolution pattern recorded in S1YDox thylakoid preparations by using the one-miss model that assumes that all misses occur during one specific S state transition, S1S2, S2S3, S3 → S0, or S0S1

Model parameter S-state transition at which all misses occur
S1S2 S2S3 S3S0 S0S1
S0 (initial), % 3.5 3.2 3.4 36.8
S1 (initial), % 95.4 94.9 94.6 61.9
S2 (initial), % 1.0 1.9 1.7 1.1
S3 (initial), % 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2
d (%) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Miss probability 0.346 0.346 0.346 0.346
χ2, ×10−4 3.7 3.8 3.8 4.1

A typical flash-induced O2 evolution pattern was used for the analysis.

Parameter accounting for decrease in O2 evolution per flash during prolonged flashing.

χ2 evaluates the goodness of the fit.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Flash-induced O2 evolution patterns measured in S1YDox thylakoid preparations (solid symbols) and the best fit (open symbols) calculated by using the one-miss model with all misses occurring in the S3S0 transition. S1YDox thylakoids were treated with two preflashes, and the O2 evolution pattern was then measured after 2 (curve 1) or 10 (curve 2) min of dark incubation. Amplitudes of O2 evolution are normalized to the maximal value in the train. (Inset) Flash-induced O2 evolution measured under the same conditions as in curve 2 in the presence or absence of 1 mM FeCy, as indicated. The data show typical flash-induced O2 evolution patterns.

O2 evolution declined with the number of flashes fired (Fig. 2, inset). A similar decline has been observed frequently in the absence of electron acceptors (24). In our case, the decline was strongly diminished in the presence of 1 mM potassium hexacyanoferrate(III) (FeCy) (Fig. 2, inset) and the decline could also be reversed in the dark (data not shown). These data indicate that O2 evolution declines because repetitive flashing reduces the electron acceptor quinones of PS II. To account for this effect, the model was extended to include flash-induced decrease in O2 evolution (parameter d).

Modeling deactivation of S states

The deactivation of higher S states can occur via charge recombination between the donor and acceptor sides of PS II (S2QBS1QB, and S3QBS2QB) or by oxidation of the reduced tyrosine YD by the S2 or S3 state (8–10,29). If YD is in the oxidized state and recombination between the S2(S3) state and QB is suppressed by using the artificial electron acceptor PPBQ, then the S3 state decays slowly in two one-electron steps via S2 (17). To study the deactivation of higher S states in the absence of chemical additives, we explored the kinetics of S state repopulation in darkness after illumination of S1YDox thylakoids by one or two flashes. The kinetics was determined in the traditional way by varying the dark-time between firing of flashes and measurement of the flash-induced O2 evolution pattern. Curve 1 in Fig. 2 shows a flashinduced O2 evolution pattern measured from S1YDox thylakoids after two preflashes followed by a short dark adaptation. The patterns were fitted with the one-miss model and deconvoluted into S state populations using the models presented in Fig. 1.

The time courses of the distributions of S states observed after one and two preflashes are plotted as a function of the dark time in Fig. 3, A and B, respectively. Two phases were observed in the decay of the higher S states. The fast phase coincided kinetically with the decay of delayed light emission after a short flash (Fig. 3 A, inset), indicating that the fast phase originates from the recombination reactions S2QBS1QB (Fig. 3 A) and S3QBS2QB (Fig. 3 B). The slow phase, in turn, can be attributed to deactivation of the S2QB and S3QB states that lack an apparent electron donor to S2 and S3. The initial amount of the S1 state in Fig. 3 A and the initial amount of the S2 state in Fig. 3 B was ∼5%, indicating a minor presence of the S0 state in S1YDox thylakoids. The kinetics of the S2 state observed in the samples illuminated by two flashes (Fig. 3 B) showed a fast rise related to recombination between the S3 state and QB during the first 50 s, and a slower decline that visually coincides with increase in S0. The amplitude of the increase in S0 was larger in samples excited by two preflashes (12%; Fig. 3 B) as compared to 3% in preparations excited by one preflash (Fig. 3 A), indicating that the amount of the precursor whose deactivation leads to the S0 state is different after one preflash and after two preflashes.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Deactivation kinetics of S-states after one (A) or two (B) preflashes in S1YDox thylakoid membranes. The data show the percentage of the sum of all S states: S0 + S1 + S2 + S3 = 100%. Each data point represents the average of three repeats, and error bars show standard deviation. Fitting was done using the one-electron-per-step model for the deactivation of the higher S-states (dotted lines, the model is shown in Fig. 1B) and using the two-electrons-per-step model (solid lines, the model is shown in Fig. 1C). (Inset) Decay of delayed light emission after one flash in S1YDox thylakoids.

Deactivation of the higher S states in PS II with oxidized QB and YD can be ascribed to the one-electron-per-step sequence: S3QBS2QBS1QB (Fig. 1 B). However, we failed to obtain a satisfactory fit using this one-electron-per-step model (Fig. 3, dotted lines), as it required more rapid deactivation of higher S states than was observed. Moreover, an increase in the S0 state was observed after illumination of S1YDox thylakoids by two flashes (Fig. 3 B), and this increase cannot be explained with the one-electron-per-step model that implies deactivation of the S2 and S3 states only to the dark stable S1 state (Fig. 1 B) (7,29). The slow rise of the S0 state cannot be due to the appearance of YDred because YDred would be rapidly reoxidized by the higher S states.

Seibert and Lavorel (20) examined the deactivation of S states in PS II preparations in the absence of artificial electron acceptors and found that the decay of the S2 state seems to be independent of the decay of the S3 state. We tested the hypothesis that independent routes of deactivation of the S3 and S2 states involve the two-electron reactions S3QBS1QB and S2QBS0QB (Fig. 1 C). The two-electron mechanism improved the fit significantly for data obtained both after one preflash and after two preflashes (Fig,. 3, A and B, solid lines). Intermediate models including only one two-electron route (either S3QBS1QB or S2QBS0QB) showed lower goodness of fit than the model including both routes (data not shown). Thus, five reactions seem to be involved in deactivation of higher S states in YDox thylakoids (Fig. 1 C). Two of the reactions can be ascribed to charge recombination between the S2 and S3 states and QB, whereas the three other reactions, S3QBS1QB, S2QBS0QB, and S2QBS1QB, occur in PS II with oxidized QB. Reactions S2QBS0QB and S2QBS1QB occur both after one and two flashes, suggesting that the same mechanism functions in both cases.

The half-times of the states S2QB and S3QB were 57 and 52 s, respectively, which is somewhat slower than has been usually observed (τ1/2 = 20–40 s) (8,16). Furthermore, half-times of reactions S3QBS1QB, S2QBS1QB, and S2QBS0QB were 230, 860, and 1380 s, respectively (Table 2, control). In particular, the decay of the S2QB state was slower than reported earlier for the reaction S2QBS1QB (τ1/2 ∼ 150–240 s) (16,17).

Table 2.

Effects of oxidizing and reducing agents on half-times of the indicated reactions of deactivation and on the relative amplitude of the one-electron reaction S3S2

Chemical addition τ1/2, s
Amplitude of S3S2(%) χ2
S3QBS1QB S2QBS1QB S2QBS0QB S1QBS0QB
None (control) 230 860 1380 nd 25 2.23
250 μM DCPIP 109 128 nd 6.3 × 103 52 1.10
250 μM DCPIP, 1 mM ascorbate 116 142 nd 4.8 × 103 49 2.46
250 μM DCBQ 61 105 nd 4.0 × 103 77 6.78
250 μM DCBQ, 1 mM FeCy 58 123 nd 7.1 × 103 71 4.56
1 mM FeCy 128 209 nd 8.6 × 104 48 5.23
1 mM ascorbate 173 288 nd 3.4 × 104 43 3.14
BBY particles, no additions 49 115 nd nd 65 11.8

Deactivation was induced by firing two flashes on S1YDox thylakoid membranes. Where indicated, kinetics was measured and analyzed in BBY particles under the same conditions. Reagents were added 3 min before the two preflashes were fired. The half-times were calculated from the kinetics of the S3 state deactivation by using the model in Fig. 1B extended with the reaction S1QBS0QB. The half-time of the recombination reaction S3QBS2QB (52 s) was assumed to be independent of the chemical additions. The relative amplitude of the S3S2 component was calculated as the ratio of the amplitude of the S3S2 component to the sum of the amplitudes of the S3S2 and S3S1 components. Goodness of the fit was evaluated with χ2; nd = not detected.

The ratios between amplitudes of the slow and fast decay components, which reflect the ratios between the initial states of PS II with oxidized and reduced QB (QB/QB), were 19:81 and 75:25 for samples illuminated by one and two flashes, respectively. Taking into account that each flash reverses the redox state of QB as shown in Fig. 1 A, this result indicates that S1YDox thylakoids contain 20%–25% of PS II centers with QB.

Effects of artificial electron acceptors on deactivation reactions

Some artificial electron acceptors, including benzoquinone derivatives and DCPIP, may noticeably influence the rate of the deactivation of S states, possibly because the reduced forms of the electron acceptors mediate shifts of OEC from more oxidized S states toward more reduced S states (18,19). Furthermore, in the presence of PPBQ, the S3QB state decays in a one-electron-per-step manner via S2QB (17) whereas a two-electron reaction, S3QBS1QB, occurs in the absence of additives (see previous section). To clarify the mechanism of deactivation in the presence of artificial electron acceptors, we measured the decay kinetics of the S3 state in the presence of DCBQ and in the presence of DCPIP. The half-times and amplitudes of the reactions were calculated according to the two-electrons-per-step-model (Fig. 1 C). DCBQ is known to mediate a shift from the S1 to the S0 state (30) and therefore the model was extended by the reaction S1QBS0QB. When 250 μM DCBQ or DCPIP were added, the half times of reactions S3QBS1QB and S2QBS1QB were diminished by 2.0–4.0 and 6.0–8.0 times, respectively, as compared to control measurements done in the absence of chemical additives (Table 2). Furthermore, these reagents completely inhibited the two-electron reaction S2QBS0QB, and a new slow one-electron reaction S1QBS0QB appeared with a half time of 4.0–6.3 × 103 s (1.1–1.8 h). DCBQ caused a more pronounced effect than DCPIP (Table 2) and the presence of DCBQ led to increase in S0 at the expense of S1. Fig. 4 shows the time-course of the redistribution of the S states in darkness after two preflashes in the presence of DCBQ. Furthermore, DCPIP plus ascorbate and DCBQ plus FeCy caused practically the same changes to kinetics as those observed in the presence of oxidized DCPIP or DCBQ alone (Table 2). Ascorbate reduces DCPIP and FeCy would oxidize any reduced hydroquinone form of DCBQ. These data indicate that DCPIP and DCBQ themselves do not act as electron sources to OEC. Moreover, despite the fact that FeCy is a potent oxidizing agent (Eo′ = 456 mV at pH 7.0), and ascorbate is a mild reductant, both reagents enhanced the decay of the S2 and S3 states (Table 2). However, effects of FeCy and ascorbate were weaker than the effects of DCPIP and DCBQ. These data indicate that the acceleration of the deactivation of the higher S states in the presence of redox agents can not be explained by an alteration of the redox conditions within the electron transport chain.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Deactivation kinetics of S states after two preflashes in S1YDox thylakoid membranes in the presence of 250 μM DCBQ. The data show the percentage of the sum of all S-states: S0 + S1 + S2 + S3 = 100%. Fitting was done using the one-electron-per-step model for the deactivation of the higher S states (dotted lines) and using the two-electrons-per-step model (solid lines) (see models in Fig. 1 B and C). Both models were extended by including the reaction S1QBS0QB. The kinetic pattern is from one representative experiment.

In control thylakoids, the one-electron-per-step route of the decay of the S3 state (S3S2) is attributed to the charge recombination S3QBS2QB, and ∼25% of the S3 state was deactivated via this pathway in control thylakoids (Table 2). The amplitude of the one-electron-per-step component of the decay of S3 increased to 50% in the presence of DCPIP and to 70%–80% in the presence of DCBQ (Table 2). Furthermore, the rate of the deactivation of S3 was fastest in the presence of DCBQ and DCPIP, intermediate in the presence of FeCy and ascorbate, and slowest in the control.

The increase in the amplitude of the fast component of S3 decay in the presence of the combination of DCPIP and ascorbate (Table 2) that efficiently reduces the plastoquinone pool (31), may be caused by recombination reactions between the higher S states and the quinone electron acceptors. Ascorbate alone causes a similar but weaker effect (Table 2), as expected because ascorbate only weakly interacts with the plastoquinone pool (32). However, both DCPIP and DCBQ would rather oxidize than reduce QB, suggesting that in the presence of these electron acceptors, the main substrate of the fast component is S3QB, not S3QB. Interestingly, the deactivation of the higher S states, measured in the presence of 250 μM DCBQ, could be fitted with the one-electron-per-step model of deactivation (Fig. 4, dotted lines). We suggest that DCBQ and oxidized DCPIP disturb OEC in such a way that the one-electron reactions S3QBS2QB and S2QBS1QB occur instead of the slow two-electron reaction S3QBS1QB. The accelerating effect of the oxidants on the decay of the S3 state decreased with decreasing lipophilicity: DCBQ (lipophilic) > oxidized DCPIP (soluble in both water and organic solvents) > FeCy (hydrophilic), suggesting that lipophilicity of the reagent is more important than oxidizing power. We propose that the lipophilic reagents have more direct access to PS II, and, hence, may cause chemical disturbance of OEC. The exact nature of the disturbance is unknown, but possibly these chemicals modify the protein envelope at the donor side of PS II making inner part of OEC more accessible to nonspecific external reductants.

We also tested deactivation reactions in BBY particles in the absence of electron acceptors. In these preparations, the miss factor and the inactivation parameter d had high values. The value of d apparently reflects a smaller number of (oxidized) plastoquinone per PS II in the BBY particles than in thylakoid membranes; this also leads to recombination between P680+ and QA, and, hence, contributes to the high miss factor. Due to the high and somewhat varying values of these two parameters, the goodness of the fit of the O2 evolution sequence, estimated with χ2, was much lower in BBY particles than in thylakoids (Table 2). Deactivation of the S3 state occurred faster and the contribution of the two-electron reactions was smaller in BBY particles than in thylakoids (Table 2). Deactivation of S3 in BBY particles actually resembles the kinetics observed in thylakoids in the presence of DCBQ, except that the reaction S1QBS0QB did not occur in BBYs. These data may suggest that detergents used in the preparation of BBY particles cause similar disturbance of OEC as DCBQ and DCPIP.

Testing hydrogen peroxide and water as electron donors for the two-electron deactivation reactions

Two-electron reactions dominate the deactivation kinetics of higher S states in PS II with oxidized QB and YD (Fig. 3, Table 2). Hypothetically, hydrogen peroxide can act as an electron donor for the reaction S2QBS0QB. We also tested the thermodynamically unfavorable possibility that water would be oxidized in the reaction S3QBS1QB. It has been shown earlier that OEC in the S2 state can oxidize H2O2 with the subsequent formation of the S0 state and molecular oxygen (33). If water was the electron donor in reaction S3QBS1QB, then the slow oxidation of H2O would be accompanied with the formation of a peroxo-Mn-complex, and this step would be followed by the exchange of hydrogen peroxide to water. Two-electron oxidation of water (Eh at pH 7 = 1.362 V) would require more energy than four-electron reaction (Eh at pH 7 = 0.815 V) (see also Bendall and Sofrová (34)), and therefore two-electron oxidation of water would have a very slow rate. This is in agreement with our data, as the reaction S3QBS1QB was characterized by a time constant of several minutes (Table 2, control).

If H2O2 acts as an electron donor in a two-electron deactivation reaction, then this reaction would decrease the H2O2 concentration. Two-electron oxidation of water, in turn, would increase the concentration H2O2. To test these assumptions, we measured the concentration of H2O2 in isolated thylakoids during the deactivation of the higher S states. In the light, generation of H2O2 occurs mainly via reduction of oxygen by the reduced electron acceptors of PS I. PS II is also known to produce H2O2, probably by a reaction between plastosemiquinone and oxygen (35). H2O2 is decomposed in thylakoid preparations by internal catalase-like activity and by catalase that is present as an impurity. We used the Amplex UltraRed/horseradish peroxidase system to measure changes in the H2O2 concentration of a thylakoid sample during 10 min of dark incubation. Analysis of resorufin fluorescence showed that thylakoid membranes generated ∼0.3 molecule of H2O2 per one PS II center during the 10 min incubation (Fig. 5 A). Similar incubation carried out under an argon flow diminished production of H2O2 by 70%–80%, equally as much as did the addition of catalase, indicating that the major part of the signal originates from the reduction of oxygen. To measure the total production of H2O2, thylakoids were first incubated for 1 min with 5 mM sodium azide to suppress their catalase activity, washed once with a fresh buffer, and incubated for 10 min with Amplex Ultrared and peroxidase. These preparations showed 50% more H2O2 production as compared with untreated thylakoids (Fig. 5 A). These data indicate that H2O2 is generated spontaneously in thylakoids, probably because of interactions between oxygen and reduced forms of photosynthetic electron carriers.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Production of hydrogen peroxide in thylakoids during 10 min dark incubation under different conditions. (A) Production of H2O2 in dark-adapted S1YDox thylakoids incubated without additives (control), with catalase (30 U in 100 μL), under argon flow, and after treatment with 5 mM sodium azide. (B) Production of H2O2 in S1YDox thylakoids during 10 min dark incubation of nonilluminated samples and after illumination of the sample with one or two flashes as indicated. The measurements were carried out in the presence (dark gray) or absence (light gray) of 0.4 μM CCCP, added 10 s after the preflash(es) were fired. H2O2 was measured with the Amplex Ultrared method. Each bar represents an average of three independent experiments and the error bars show standard deviation.

To find out whether the deactivation process influences the H2O2 content, we measured H2O2 production after illumination of S1YDox thylakoids by one or two flashes. The assay reagents, Amplex UltraRed and peroxidase, were added into the sample 20 s after firing the flash(es), and the mixture was incubated for 10 min in the dark before the fluorescence signal was measured. CCCP, which is an ADRY reagent (acceleration of the deactivation reactions of the water-splitting enzyme system Y), was used to speed up reactions of deactivation so that they were completed before the addition of the H2O2 assay reagents (36). As shown in Fig. 5 B, CCCP did not affect production of H2O2 in dark-adapted thylakoids, whereas slightly less (statistically not fully resolved) H2O2 was produced in the presence of this reagent in preparations illuminated by one or two flashes. These data show that a small amount of hydrogen peroxide, corresponding to one molecule per 20–30 PS II centers, is probably generated during the deactivation process. However, the amplitude of the S3QBS1QB component was ∼75% and therefore the amount H2O2 produced would be higher by one order of magnitude than the observed amount if water was the electron donor in the deactivation of S3QB. Thus, we conclude that water does not act as an electron donor to the S3QBS1QB reaction. These data also indicate that internally produced H2O2 does not act as an electron donor to this reaction, because no decrease in H2O2 production was observed in thylakoids after illumination by two flashes.

The reaction S2QBS0QB is slow (τ1/2 = 23 min) and has a low amplitude (12%), which makes it difficult to directly measure the decrease in H2O2 associated with this reaction. Therefore, we measured the kinetics of the S3 state deactivation in the presence of catalase, which decreases the amount of the internally produced H2O2 (Fig. 5 A) and, hence, should slow down reaction S2QBS0QB if the latter reaction is coupled to oxidation of H2O2. The reaction S2QBS0QB was slightly slower in the presence of catalase (τ1/2 = 1540 s), as compared to control (τ1/2 = 1380 s), and its amplitude was 5%, that is <12% amplitude in control thylakoids. The catalase treatment had virtually no effect on the other kinetic components (data not shown). Due to the low amplitude of the reaction S2QBS0QB (12%), the changes observed in the presence of catalase are not statistically significant. External H2O2 added in concentration of 100 μM into thylakoids did not affect the decay kinetics of the S states and 500 μM H2O2 caused noticeable changes in the shape of the O2 evolution pattern accompanied by decrease in O2 evolution, suggesting damage to OEC (data not shown). These data may indicate that H2O2 is not an efficient electron donor to the reaction S2QBS0QB or that external H2O2 cannot reach the manganese cluster. The catalase effect may suggest that small amount of hydrogen peroxide produced in thylakoids acts as an electron source for the reaction S2QBS0QB. However, more experiments are needed to elucidate the possible role of internally produced H2O2 in deactivation of OEC.

Conclusion

The deactivation of the higher S states of the OEC, particularly of the S3 state, cannot be entirely explained by the recombination between the donor side of PS II and QB. The deactivation process has been studied in a number of publications (11,12,13,15), but the slow decay of the S3 and S2 states observed in PS II centers with oxidized QB is poorly understood. To elucidate the mechanism of the slow deactivation, we measured and analyzed the kinetics of the redistribution of S states after illumination of S1YDox thylakoids by one or two laser flashes. The fast components of the decay of the higher S states (τ1/2 ∼ 50 s) were attributed to recombination between S2 and S3 and QB, whereas the slow components (τ1/2 > 4 min) were assigned to the deactivation of S2 and S3 in PS II centers containing an oxidized QB. The slow components were represented by the one-electron reaction S2QBS1QB (τ1/2 = 14 min) and by the two-electron reactions S3QBS1QB (τ1/2 = 4 min) and S2QBS0QB (τ1/2 = 23 min), reported for the first time in this study. In the presence of artificial electron acceptors, particularly the lipophilic DCBQ, the two-electron reactions were substituted by a more rapid one-electron-per-step sequence, S3QBS2QBS1QBS0QB. The deactivation of higher S states proceeded predominately via a one-electron mechanism also in BBY particles. Our data suggest that the sensitivity of the deactivation mechanism to the artificial electron acceptors and to the detergents required for extraction of BBY particles may explain why the two-electron reactions were not seen in earlier studies. We suggest that the mechanism of deactivation of the higher S states observed in intact thylakoids in the absence of redox reagents characterizes the behavior of OEC in vivo.

Hydrogen peroxide and water were tested as sources of electrons for the two-electron reactions of deactivation. The data suggest that H2O2 produced by thylakoids in the dark may to some extent act as a substrate for the slow S2QBS0QB reaction. H2O2 assays did not support the hypothesis that water or hydrogen peroxide act as electron donors for the reaction S3QBS1QB.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Marja Hakala for ideas and for assistance in experiments.

This study was supported by the Academy of Finland (119557 and 110409).

References

  • 1.Goussias C., Boussac A., Rutherford A.W. Photosystem II and photosynthetic oxidation of water: an overview. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2002;357:1369–1381. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kern J., Renger G. Photosystem II: Structure and mechanism of the water: plastoquinone oxidoreductase. Photosynth. Res. 2007;94:183–202. doi: 10.1007/s11120-007-9201-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ferreira K.N., Iverson T.M., Maghlaoui K., Barber J., Iwata S. Architecture of the photosynthetic oxygen-evolving center. Science. 2004;303:1831–1838. doi: 10.1126/science.1093087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yano J., Yachandra V.K. Where water is oxidized to dioxygen: structure of the photosynthetic Mn4Ca cluster from X-ray spectroscopy. Inorg. Chem. 2008;47:1711–1726. doi: 10.1021/ic7016837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Barber J. Crystal structure of the oxygen-evolving complex of photosystem II. Inorg. Chem. 2008;47:1700–1710. doi: 10.1021/ic701835r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kok B., Forbush B., McGloin M. Cooperation of charges in photosynthetic O2 evolution. Photochem. Photobiol. 1970;11:457–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1970.tb06017.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Joliot P., Kok B. Oxygen evolution in photosynthesis. In: Govinjee, editor. Bioenergetics of Photosynthesis. Academic Press; New York: 1975. pp. 388–413. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Forbush B., Kok B., McGloin M. Cooperation of charges in photosynthetic oxygen evolution-II. Damping of flash yield oscillation, deactivation. Photochem. Photobiol. 1971;14:307–321. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Delrieu M.J. Simple explanation of the misses in the cooperation of charges in photosynthetic oxygen evolution. Photochem. Photobiol. 1974;20:441–454. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Delrieu M.J. Evidence for unequal misses in oxygen flash yield sequence in photosynthesis. Z. Naturforsch. 1983;38c:247–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Babcock G.T., Sauer K. Electron paramagnetic resonance signal in spinach chloroplasts. I. Kinetic analysis for untreated chloroplasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1973;325:483–503. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(73)90209-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rutherford A.W., Crofts A.R., Inoue I. Thermoluminescence as a probe of Photosystem II photochemistry: the origin of the flash induced glow peaks. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1982;682:457–465. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vass I., Styring S. pH-dependent charge equilibria between tyrosine-D and the S-states in Photosystem II. Estimation of relative midpoint redox potentials. Biochemistry. 1991;30:830–839. doi: 10.1021/bi00217a037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Buser C.A., Diner B.A., Brudvig G.W. Photooxidation of cytochrome b559 in oxygen-evolving photosystem. Biochemistry. 1992;31:11449–11459. doi: 10.1021/bi00161a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Feyziyev Y., van Rotterdam B.J., Bernát G., Styring S. Electron transfer from cytochrome b559 and tyrosine D to the S2 and S3 states of the water oxidizing complex in Photosystem II. Chem. Phys. 2003;294:415–431. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rutherford, Govinjee A.W., Inoue Y. Charge accumulation and photochemistry in leaves studied by thermoluminescence and delayed light emission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1984;81:1107–1111. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.4.1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Styring S., Rutherford A.W. Deactivation kinetics and temperature dependence of the S-state transitions in the oxygen-evolving system of Photosystem II measured by EPR spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1988;933:378–387. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Maslenkova L., Zeinalov Y. Effect of some artificial electron donors and acceptors on the functioning of the photosynthetic oxygen evolving system. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 1995;21:3–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Spiegel S., Bader K. Dependence of the flash-induced oxygen evolution pattern on the chemically and far red light-modulated redox conditions in cyanobacterial photosynthetic electron transport. Z. Naturforsch. 2003;58c:93–102. doi: 10.1515/znc-2003-1-217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Seibert M., Lavorel J. Oxygen evolution patterns from spinach Photosystem II preparations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1983;723:160–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hakala M., Tuominen I., Keränen M., Tyystjärvi T., Tyystjärvi E. Evidence for the role of the oxygen-evolving manganese complex in photo inhibition of Photosystem II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2005;1706:68–80. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2004.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Berthold D.A., Babcock G.T., Yokum C.F. A highly resolved, oxygen-evolving photosystem II preparation from spinach thylakoid membranes. FEBS Lett. 1981;134:231–234. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Joliot P., Joliot A. A polarographic method for detection of oxygen production and reduction of Hill reagent by isolated chloroplasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1968;153:625–631. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(68)90190-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Delrieu M.J., Rosengard F. Fundamental difference between period-4 oscillations of the oxygen and fluorescence yield induced by flash excitation in inside-out thylakoids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1987;892:163–171. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tyystjärvi E., Rantamäki S., Tyystjärvi J. Connectivity of Photosystem II is the physical basis of retrapping in photosynthetic thermoluminescence. Biophys. J. 2009;96:3735–3743. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jursinic P. Investigation of double turnovers in photosystem II charge separation and oxygen evolution with excitation flashes of different duration. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1981;635:38–52. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(81)90005-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shinkarev V.P. Flash-induced oxygen evolution and other oscillation processes. In: Wydzynski T., Satoh K., editors. Photosystem II. In Photosystem II: The Water/Plastoquinone Oxido-Reductase In Photosynthesis. Kluwer Academic Publishers; Dordrecht: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lavorel J. Matrix analysis of the oxygen evolving system of photosynthesis. J. Theor. Biol. 1976;57:171–185. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(76)80011-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Velthuys B.R., Visser J.W.M. The reactivation of EPR signal II in chloroplasts treated with reduced dichlorophenol-indophenol: evidence against a dark equilibrium between two oxidation states of the oxygen evolving system. FEBS Lett. 1975;55:109–112. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(75)80971-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stemler A., Lavergne J. Evidence that formate destabilizes the S1 state of the oxygen-evolving mechanism in photosystem II. Photosynth. Res. 1997;51:83–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Allen J.F., Holmes N.G. Electron transport and redox titration. In: Hipkins M.F., Baker N.R., editors. Photosynthesis-Energy Transduction. A Practical Approach. IRL Press; Oxford: 1986. pp. 103–141. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mano J., Hideg É, Asada K. Ascorbate in thylakoid lumen functions as an alternative donor to photosystem II and photosystem I. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004;429:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2004.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Velthuys B., Kok B. Photosynthetic oxygen evolution from hydrogen peroxide. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1978;502:211–221. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(78)90043-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bendall D.S., Sofrová D. Reactions at 77°K in Photosystem 2 of green plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1971;234:371–380. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(71)90204-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ivanov B.N. Cooperation of photosystem I with the plastoquinone pool in oxygen reduction in higher plant chloroplasts. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 2008;73:112–118. doi: 10.1134/s0006297908010173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Renger G., Bouges-Bocquet B., Delosme R. Studies on the ADRY agent-induced mechanism of the discharge of the holes trapped in the photosynthetic watersplitting enzyme system Y. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1973;292:796–807. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(73)90026-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES