Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 17;96(12):4834–4852. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.058

Table 2.

Pacemaker potential characteristic values comparison

Ref. n MDP (mV) Frequency (cpm) Amplitude (mV) Half-width (s) dVm/dtmax (V s−1)
(5) 39 −69.6 ± 4.5 26.1 ± 2.4 56.3 ± 5.3 1.00 ± 0.16 1.51 ± 0.30
(16) 12 −68.7 ± 2.5 24.2 ± 1.5 58.9 ± 3.0 0.91 ± 0.09 1.85 ± 0.29
(15) 5 −70.0 16.2 73.1 0.49 ± 0.03 6.40 ± 0.60

Range (−74.1)–(−65.1) 16.2–28.5 51.0–73.1 0.46–1.16 1.21–7.00
Youm et al. (42) −78.0 20 79.2 0.64 7.10
Model simulations −69.8 ± 0.14 17.4 ± 0.03 64.5 ± 0.16 0.72 ± 0.02 1.32 ± 0.05

Here, n denotes the number of observations made from separate tissue preparations.