Skip to main content
editorial
. 2008 May 21;14(19):2962–2967. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.2962

Table 2.

Bleeding and perforation rate of various endoscopic submucosal dissection methods for stomach, esophagus and colorectum

Site Author Year Method Total cases Bleeding (%) Perforation (%)
Stomach Yamamoto[33] 2002 EMRSH 70 4 0
Ishigooka[34] 2004 s-ERHSE 34 0 12
Oda[35] 2005 ESD-IT knife 1 033 6 4
Kakushima[32] 2006 ESD-Flex knife 383 3.4 3.9
Imagawa[36] 2006 ESD-Flex knife 159 0 6.1
Oyama[37] 2006 ESD-Hook knife 111 - 1
Onozato[38] 2006 ESD-Flex knife 171 7.6 3.5
Hirasaki[39] 2007 ESD-IT knife 112 4 1
Esophagus Oyama[8] 2005 ESD-Hook knife 102 - 0
Fujishiro[11] 2006 ESD-Flex knife 58 0 6.9
Colorectum Fujishiro[31] 2007 ESD-Flex knife 200 1 6
Saito[40] 2007 ESD-several knives 200 2 5
Tanaka[41] 2007 ESD-several knives 70 1.4 10
Tamegai[42] 2007 ESD-Hook knife 74 - 1.4
Hurlstone[50] 2007 ESD-Flex knife 42 12 2.4
Onozato[43] 2007 ESD-Flex knife 35 0 2.9