Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;102(1):192–202. doi: 10.1152/jn.00135.2009

TABLE 2.

Effect of mGluR agonists on the three components of the fEPSP

Drug Applied Specificity N2, Pulse 1 N2, Pulse 2 N3, Pulse 2
aCSF None 97.5 ± 2.3 104.7 ± 4.3 95.4 ± 9.5
ACPD Groups I, II, and III 72.9 ± 6.4* 108.9 ± 7.5 20.9 ± 12.7*
DHPG Group I 95.8 ± 4.4 92.7 ± 1.2 83.5 ± 14.0
APDC Group II 103.4 ± 3.6 128.4 ± 14.0 75.9 ± 18.5
l-AP4, 0.25 μM Group III 77.1 ± 4.1* 98.0 ± 5.8 25.5 ± 31.2*
l-AP4, 2.5 μM Group III 50.1 ± 8.8* 77.9 ± 12.5* 2.3 ± 1.6*
ACPT-III mGluR4a 48.1 ± 3.3* 87.0 ± 5.4 11.5 ± 11.5*
Homo AMPA mGluR6 97.9 ± 4.4 103.2 ± 5.1 93.2 ± 7.4
AMN-082 mGluR7 96.6 ± 3.8 99.8 ± 2.1 110.1 ± 13.6
PPG mGluR8 76.4 ± 8.3 90.6 ± 5.0 16.9 ± 9.7*

Values are means±SE. Each value is the average of at least three cases. This table shows how drugs affected the amplitudes of all three potentials that were quantified. Measurements were standardized to baseline levels; 100 means no change occurred from baseline. Asterisks denote significance at P < 0.05.