Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 22;102(1):294–301. doi: 10.1152/jn.00184.2009

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Percentage of movements falling in the training target zone (pTTZ). A: with anodal tDCS applied during training there was a significant increase in movements falling within the TTZ during p1 and p2. Asterisks denote P ≤ 0.02. B: 50 min after the cessation of anodal tDCS (p3) TMS-evoked movement directions returned to premotor training values (n = 3). C: TMS-evoked movement directions were similar between sham and cathodal sessions at p1 and p2 times (n = 3). D: application of anodal tDCS for 30 min without motor training did not elicit changes in pTTZ. Data are means ± SE.