Skip to main content
. 2008 May 20;102(1):49–55. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn065

Table 4.

Size distributions of Thesium haustoria found on the roots of each host species

Size range (mm)
Species no. Species <1·0 1·0–1·5 1·5–2·0 2·0–2·5 2·5–3·0 >3·0 Significance
 1 Lespedeza juncea 548 259 106 40 3 0 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9
 2 Andropogon virginicus 659 136 41 7 1 0 1
 3 Cymbopogon tortilis 410 111 18 8 2 1 1
 4 Eragrostis curvula 368 75 4 1 0 0 1
 5 Agrostis sp. 259 54 5 0 0 0 1
 6 Artemisia capillaris 214 69 23 1 0 0
 7 Pueraria lobata 124 37 17 12 3 0 8
 8 Rumex acetosella 149 16 2 0 0 0 1,7
 9 Dianthus superbus 74 11 1 0 0 0 1
10 Erigeron annuus 48 12 0 0 0 0
11 Praecoces sp. 38 4 0 0 0 0
12 Viola mandshurica 28 2 0 0 0 0
13 Galium verum 24 1 0 0 0 0
14 Briza maxima 18 0 0 0 0 0
15 Potentilla chinensis 12 2 0 0 0 0
16 Oxalis corniculata 9 0 0 0 0 0
17 Poaceae sp. 5 0 0 0 0 0
18 Fabaceae sp. 4 0 0 0 0 0
19 Vicia sepium 1 1 0 0 0 0
20 Agropyron sp. 1 0 0 0 0 0

The size distributions were significantly different among species (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0·0001). Pairs of species that had significant differences in the sizes of Thesium haustoria (Scheffe's test, P < 0·05) are indicated by species number.