Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;20(Suppl 6):vi8–vi13. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp251

Table 1.

Potential cutaneous melanoma biomarkers detected by immunohistochemical analysis of tissue microarrays

Biomarker Observation Ref.
Hsp90 Increased expression in melanomas compared with nevi and in metastatic compared with primary tumours. Correlation with tumour thickness and higher Clark level. No association seen between high expression and survival in the subsets of patients with primary or metastatic tumours. [23]
RGS1 Correlation with increased tumour thickness, mitotic rate and vascular involvement; reduced RFS and DSS. [24]
Osteopontin Correlation with increased tumour thickness, higher Clark level, mitotic index; reduced RFS and DSS; predictive of SLN metastasis and SLN burden. [25]
HER3 Correlation with increased cell proliferation, tumour progression; reduced survival. [26]
ING4 Reduced levels associated with melanoma thickness, ulceration and poor DSS and OS. [27]
ING3 Reduced nuclear expression associated with poor DSS; an independent prognostic factor to predict patient outcome. [28]
NCOA3 Increased levels predictive of SLN metastasis and associated with poor RFS and DSS. [29]
MCM4 Increased levels associated with poor DFS and OS. [5]
MCM6 Increased levels associated with poor DFS and OS. [5]

DFS, disease-free survival; DSS, disease-specific survival; IHC, immunohistochemistry; OS, overall survival; RFS, relapse-free survival; SLN, sentinel lymph node.