Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Aug 9;26(5):667–675. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.06.007

Table 3.

Metabolite concentrations (in institutional units) in the FWM, FGM, PGM and BG regions among the subjects by gender

Voxel location NAA Cr Cho Glu
FWM
   Men (N=30) 8.05±0.14 * 4.82±0.11 ** 2.16±0.05 5.21±0.17 ***
   Women (N=20) 7.92±0.19 a 4.93±0.11 2.10±0.06 b 5.71±0.23 c
FGM
   Men (N=30) 7.85±0.12 5.83±0.15 1.99±0.06 7.16±0.18
   Women (n=19) 7.49±0.16 5.85±0.21 2.02±0.08 7.54±0.25
PGM
   Men (n=26) 8.26±0.13 6.22±0.13 1.50±0.05 7.35±0.24
   Women (n=16) 7.98±0.25 5.95±0.16 1.44±0.04 6.64±0.24
BG
   Men (n=28) 7.90±0.11 4.62±0.11 1.52±0.07 3.85±0.21
   Women (n=19) 7.29±0.15 4.63±0.11 1.52±0.05 4.09±0.24

Values are reported as mean±S.E.

*

Effect of region is significant by analysis of variance (ANOVA), P<.0001.

**

Effect of region is significant by ANOVA, P=.0057.

***

Effect of region is significant by ANOVA, P<.0001.

a

Effect of region is significant by ANOVA, P=.024.

b

Effect of region is significant by ANOVA, P=.025.

c

Effect of region is significant by ANOVA, P=.033.