Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 21;15(27):3398–3404. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3398

Table 2.

Liver stiffness measurements applicability

Position, operator and quality criteria Applicability (%) Presumed fibrosis stages among applicable patients F0F1/F2/F3/F4 n (%)c
Reference position 306/442 (69)a 167 (55)/59 (19)/51 (17)/29 (9)d
Operator 1 208/329 (63) 117 (56)/40 (19)/32 (15)/19 (9)
Valid10 312/329 (95)
SR60 300/329 (91)
IQR30 220/329 (67)
Operator 2 98/113 (87) 50 (51)/19 (19)/19 (19)/10 (10)
Valid10 113/113 (100)
SR60 113/113 (100)
IQR30 98/113 (87)
Anterior position 357/442 (81)a 223 (62)/52 (15)/49 (14)/33 (9)d
Operator 1 255/329 (78) 166 (65)/34 (13)/31 (12)/24 (9)
Valid10 300/329 (91)
SR60 296/329 (90)
IQR30 271/329 (82)b
Operator 2 102/113 (90) 57 (56)/18 (18)/18 (18)/9 (9)
Valid10 111/113 (98)
SR60 111/113 (98)
IQR30 103/113 (91)b
Lower position 302/442 (68)a 170 (56)/49 (16)/47 (16)/36 (12)
Operator 1 224/329 (68) 126 (56)/36 (16)/36 (16)/26 (12)
Valid10 299/329 (91)
SR60 291/329 (88)
IQR30 240/329 (73)b
Operator 2 78/113 (69) 44 (56)/13 (17)/11 (14)/10 (13)
Valid10 96/113 (85)
SR60 94/113 (83)
IQR30 86/113 (76)b
a

Applicability of the anterior position was significantly higher than that of the reference and the lower positions (both P = 0.0001);

b

IQR30 was obtained more frequently with the anterior position than with the reference and lower positions for operator 1 (82% vs 67% P < 0.0001; 82% vs 73% P = 0.004) and for operator 2 (91% vs 87% P = 0.40; 91% vs 76% P = 0.004);

c

Presumed fibrosis stage (METAVIR scoring system) using 7.7 kPa for F2, 8.8 kPa for F3 and 14.5 kPa for F4;

d

Presumed prevalence of non-advanced fibrosis was lower using the reference position than the anterior position (P = 0.04).