Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 21;15(27):3398–3404. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3398

Table 5.

Strength of concordance between LSM and FibroTest (FT) according to positions

Position (No. of patients) Method assessing
Kappa
Discordance rate (%)
Quantitative concordance Spearman mean (95% CI) Intra class coefficient mean (95% CI)
All positions applicable
Reference (196) 0.46 (0.34-0.56) 0.55 (0.33-0.67)
Anterior (196) 0.46 (0.34-0.56) 0.56 (0.34-0.68)
Lower (196) 0.40 (0.27-0.51) 0.50 (0.38-0.62)
Mean of positions (196) 0.47 (0.35-0.57) 0.56 (0.34-0.68)
At least one position applicable
Reference (306) 0.44 (0.35-0.53) 0.51 (0.39-0.63)
Anterior (357) 0.46 (0.38-0.54) 0.54 (0.32-0.66)
Lower (302) 0.39 (0.29-0.49) 0.50 (0.38-0.62)
Two classes concordance Discordance rate n (%) Kappa mean (SE)
Cutoff 7.1 kPa
All positions applicable
Reference (196) 66 (33.6)a 0.30 (0.07)
Anterior (196) 61 (31.1) 0.32 (0.07)
Lower (196) 71 (36.2) 0.24 (0.07)
Mean of positions (196) 67 (34.2) 0.28 (0.07)
At least one position applicable
Reference (306) 107 (34.9)b 0.28 (0.06)
Anterior (357) 112 (31.6) 0.33 (0.05)
Lower (302) 109 (36.1)c 0.24 (0.06)
Cutoff 8.8 kPa
All positions applicable
Reference (196) 46 (23.5)a 0.45 (0.07)
Anterior (196) 54 (27.6) 0.33 (0.07)
Lower (196) 56 (28.6) 0.34 (0.07)
Mean of positions (196) 52 (26.5) 0.37 (0.07)
At least one position applicable
Reference (306) 82 (26.8)b 0.38 (0.06)
Anterior (357) 108 (30.2) 0.30 (0.05)
Lower (302) 84 (27.8)c 0.34 (0.06)

a,b,cP = 0.03 between 7.1 and 8.8 kPa.