Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 29;185(7):1243–1258. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200809044

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Dsg1 promotes differentiation in the absence of robust PG binding. (A) To test which domains of Dsg1 would be sufficient to drive differentiation, we generated three Flag-tagged Dsg1 cDNA constructs: WT Dsg1 (Dsg1WT), a triple point mutant harboring three Ala substitutions (Dsg1AAA) within the predicted binding region for PG, or a truncation mutant lacking the ectodomain (ECTO) and transmembrane (TM) region (ΔN-Dsg1). CYTO, cytoplasmic domain. (B) The subcellular localization of Dsg1WT, Dsg1AAA, or ΔN-Dsg1 was determined in keratinocytes immunostained using a rabbit polyclonal antibody directed against Flag and a chicken polyclonal antibody against PG after exposing cells to high Ca2+ for 4 h to induce junction assembly. Both Dsg1WT and Dsg1AAA were efficiently recruited to areas of cell–cell contact; however, ΔN-Dsg1 was diffusely distributed throughout the cytoplasm. PG staining highlighted the intercellular borders; its localization at junctions was largely unaffected by any of the Dsg1 constructs. (C) Western blot analysis of keratinocytes transduced with these Dsg1 constructs and induced to differentiate for 2 d as submerged cultures. Although Dsg1WT and Dsg1AAA were sufficient to increase Dsc1/K10/loricrin, ΔN-Dsg1 did not affect these markers of differentiation compared with EGFP-transduced (Dsg1−) control cultures. FL, full length; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Bar, 20 µm.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure