Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Radiother Oncol. 2008 Oct 29;90(3):367–376. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.08.012

Table 3.

Comparison of delivered rectum and bladder doses by different online IGRT methods. The values are expressed as percentages of target (prostate) dose.

Rectum
Patient # CRT Bone CRT Re-plan IMRT Bone IMRT Target IMRT Re-plan Volume IMRT Re-plan Wall
1 94.5% 83.3% 85.2% 73.4% 68.3% 67.8%
2 87.4% 80.8% 72.0% 63.6% 65.9% 66.4%
3 85.7% 80.8% 73.1% 75.4% 69.4% 66.3%
4 92.1% 81.9% 80.2% 70.1% 70.7% 70.1%
5 89.8% 79.7% 82.9% 72.6% 69.4% 68.2%
6 92.4% 83.6% 84.0% 72.7% 71.8% 71.8%
7 88.9% 78.8% 77.6% 68.6% 65.0% 64.2%
8 90.2% 79.1% 83.2% 73.3% 70.1% 69.3%
9 93.5% 81.8% 78.4% 70.6% 70.1% 68.4%
Mean 90.5% 81.1% 79.6% 71.1% 69.0% 68.0%
Bladder
Patient # CRT Bone CRT Re-plan IMRT Bone IMRT Target IMRT Re-plan Volume IMRT Re-plan Wall
1 75.5% 66.4% 61.9% 56.8% 55.7% 54.9%
2 81.5% 61.3% 71.8% 53.5% 51.8% 51.7%
3 68.9% 48.7% 69.7% 51.8% 48.3% 47.6%
4 76.9% 54.1% 68.1% 55.9% 50.5% 50.3%
5 74.5% 56.7% 69.5% 57.2% 53.1% 52.4%
6 81.8% 66.8% 74.1% 60.6% 61.5% 60.0%
7 60.3% 41.5% 58.6% 42.4% 41.7% 40.5%
8 62.7% 41.7% 58.3% 41.4% 42.1% 40.8%
9 60.2% 46.0% 57.7% 45.5% 44.9% 44.3%
Mean 71.3% 53.7% 65.5% 51.7% 49.9% 49.2%