Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;11(8):771–779. doi: 10.1593/neo.09490

Table 3.

Serum Levels of vWf, VEGF, Angiogenin, Fas-L, and sFas and Numbers of CECs and CPCs in Different Prognostic Groups According to the NPI.

Variable Healthy Controls (n = 63) Breast Cancer NPI Groups (n = 160) P*

GPG (n = 58) MPG (n = 59) PPG (n = 35)
vWf (IU/dl) 116 (108–130) 130 (120–145) 123 (107–136) 140 (124–157) <.0001
VEGF (pg/ml) 20 (3–1600) 135 (10–2175) 250 (10–2900) 30 (2–800) .26
Angiogenin (pg/ml) 243 (163–326) 338 (280–420) 320 (270–390) 345 (278–475) <.0001
sFas-L (pg/ml) 182 (114–1128) 153 (100–433) 146 (80–338) 154 (84–435) .26
sFas (pg/ml) 1635 (1023–2643) 1600 (1260–2500) 1410 (1120–2170) 1600 (960–2250) .70
CECs (cells/ml) 7.7 (6–10) 8.0 (4–8) 8.0 (4–12) 14.0 (8–22) <.0001§
CPCs (cells/ml) 169 (106–241) 113 (73–190) 132 (96–204) 120 (72–150) .004

Data are median with IQRs in parentheses.

*

Kruskal-Wallis P value over the four groups. Subgroup analysis was by Dunn test.

HC versus GPG, P < .001; PPG, P < .001; MPG versus PPG, P < .01.

HC versus GPG, MPG, and PPG, all P < .001.

§

HC versus PPG, P < .001; GPG versus PPG, P < .001; MPG versus PPG, P < .05.

HC versus GPG, P < .05; HC versus PPG, P < .01.